We're all Anti-Semites Now
June 26, 2009
By Henry Makow Ph.D.Anti-Semitism used to refer to a racial prejudice against Jews. Now "hate" is a codeword for something else: Opposition to Zionism, a political program that many Jews find repugnant.
By equating "hate" with opposition to Zionism, organized Jewry has given everyone permission to be an anti-Semite.
In Soviet Russia, anti-Semitism was considered "counter revolutionary" and severely punished. Similarly, anti-Semitism is now a political crime in the West because it runs counter to the New World Order.
For example, a Winnipeg journalist, Leslie Hughes, was dropped as a Liberal candidate in the 2008 election for remarking on Israeli foreknowledge of the 9-11 attack in an 2003 article. She was quoting an Israeli newspaper. She taught courses on tolerance and had no feelings of hostility against Jews whatsoever. Her crime was political. (She is suing the Jewish groups.)
My writing warns Jews they have been used to advance the central banker's plan for world government dictatorship. I emphasize that every significant nation, religion and organization is being used in the same way. Nonetheless, the Canadian Jewish Congress accuses me of "hatred against Jews" and wants to suppress my writing on this subject. The absurdity of accusing the son of holocaust survivors of anti-Semitism only underlines the true political nature of my crime.
YOU ARE AN ANTI SEMITE IF ...
Rev. Ted Pike extrapolates from the 2004 US "Global Anti-Semitism Review Act" to define the kind of political activity that is being criminalized. ("The Real Motive Behind
'Dept Of Global Anti-Semitism'")
1. Any assertion "that the Jewish community controls government, the media, international business and the financial world" is anti-Semitic.
2. "Strong anti-Israel sentiment" is anti-Semitic.
3. "Virulent criticism" of Israel's leaders, past or present, is anti-Semitic.
4. Criticism of the Jewish religion or its religious leaders or literature (especially the Talmud and Kabbalah) is anti-Semitic.
5. Criticism of the U.S. government and Congress for being under undue influence by the Jewish-Zionist community (including AIPAC) is anti-Semitic.
6. Criticism of the Jewish-Zionist community for promoting globalism (the "New World Order") is anti-Semitic.
7. Blaming Jewish leaders and their followers for inciting the Roman crucifixion of Christ is anti-Semitic.
8. Diminishing the "six million" figure of holocaust victims is anti-Semitic.
9. Calling Israel a "racist" state is anti-Semitic.
10. Asserting that a "Zionist Conspiracy" exists is anti-Semitic.
11. Claiming that Jews and their leaders created the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia is anti-Semitic.
12. Making "derogatory statements about Jewish persons" is anti-Semitic.
13. Denying the right of mostly atheist Jews to re-occupy Palestine is anti-Semitic.
14. Alleging that Mossad was behind the 9/11 attack is anti-Semitic.
Essentially if you believe in truth and justice, you're an anti-Semite. If you believe in free speech, free inquiry and the democratic process, you're an anti-Semite. If you oppose tyranny, corruption and murder, you're an anti-Semite.
If you're not an anti-Semite, you're uninformed at best, and a sell-out ("vendu") at worst.
Ultimately, the New World Order will turn 90% of the world's population and at least 50% of Jews into anti-Semites. Is this the real agenda? To divert blame away from the central banksters and their non-Jewish Masonic minions?
THE SYNAGOGUE OF SATAN
Andrew Hitchcock's "The Synagogue of Satan" is a compelling chronology of the Jewish role in the central banker's Satanic conspiracy a.k.a The New World Order. Together with my Illuminati, it provides as an excellent introduction to the subject.
The only knock is that Hitchcock does not provide references. For example, he lifts the above list from the Internet without giving credit to Rev. Pike. Nevertheless Hitchcock's sources can be verified online.I was impressed by the amount of new information and insight I found. Hitchcock explains how the "nationalization" of the Bank of England in 1946 was a sleight-of-hand. He provides new information on the art of money creation. He lucidly explains the significance of the Noahide Laws.
You read this book with growing fury at the scale of ruthlessness, criminality and chutzpah of certain Jews. These Jews are not God's Chosen people, but Satan's, a matter that should be of concern to the others who are guilty mostly of naivety, complacency, conformity, cowardice, opportunism and even some complicity. (The same can be said of Americans who support US war crimes in Iraq and Afghanistan with their tax dollars. Neither can hold their head up.)
Hitchcock quotes Werner Sombart who says that from 1820 onward, there was "only one power in Europe, and that is Rothschild." He says modern capitalism and Americanism are nothing else but "the Jewish spirit distilled." Certainly we must analyze the positive and negative aspects of this spirit, weighing material prosperity against spiritual, cultural and political bankruptcy. We must realize that modern Western civilization is essentially Cabalist (Masonic) and Jewish, and increasingly so.
CONCLUSION
Does the New World Order represent the central banker's need to consolidate power? Is this culmination of a Jewish agenda, or a more general satanic agenda? I suggest that these three agendas are complementary and overlapping.
Our world is the product of a long-term Satanic conspiracy to overthrow Christian civilization and institute a veiled dictatorship using the mass media, education and sophisticated technology. All the scoundrels selling their fellow Americans down the river are put there by the central banking cartel, re. David Rockefeller, US franchisee.
In 1984 George Orwell predicted that reality would be turned upside down. Black would become white according to Big Brother diktat. Now that free speech is a political crime, Orwell's prophecy has come true.
We must resist the globalists with all our power. A people too stupid or weak to demand their freedom don't deserve to be free.
They bribe us with our own money now but eventually the bankers will demand payment in blood.
--------
Naomi Klein Calls for Boycott of Israel
Tony said (June 27, 2009):
The term "antisemite" is a perfect example of Orwellian double think. As you mention in the start of your article, in the past everyone automatically, mostly subconsciously, translated this term into "prejudice against Jews." Why, then, was not the term used: "anti Jew?" If this is what is meant, why is it not what is stated? Those few people who realize the literal meaning of the term have to go through a correction of definition even to discuss it.
Plus, since Judaism is not truly religious, nor even racial (Paquita de Shishmareff described it to me as a cult worshiping Talmudic law religionized - which is obviously no longer current), but, again as you mention at times, more cultural, then semitism has nothing whatsoever to do with Judaism and is not a properly used term but a misnomer. I was invited once by a friend to "come over to the winning side" (to convert to Judaism) and I know I have no semitic blood.
So why is it so important to those running the show to use "anitsemitism" and not "anti Jew?" What is the onus of the term "anti Jew" we are not allowed to see? Does it have to do with keeping the "lowly" amheretz "shop keeping Jews" in line? Would they disown the "elitists" if they felt more directly vulnerable to suffering for those elitists' acts?