Sorry, you need to update your flash player to view this flash animation. You may download the flash player from here. However, you should still be able to view the rest of this page.

Below- Ayn Rand: Another Communist Jew (scroll down)

American Expat Considers Returning Home

July 30, 2014


(left, in spite of Panama City's impressive skyline, Panama is very much a third-world country)

Joe Spickard explains why he has soured on

Panama as a refuge from the United States.

'I think you would be nearly better off in an American Gulag than here in a strange land and culture where no one cares and life is much, much cheaper".

by Joe Spickard


(This was grafted from an article by Joe and an email.)

I came to live in Panama about seven years ago.

It was not a closed society or did it contain an exotic culture or a center of spirituality. But it was a refuge at the time.

You see, I was convinced that the United States would undergo cataclysmic changes. And, indeed, it has. Its economy has never recovered to its former strength as its economic recession started the month that I left the States. I believed that it would become a fascist security state, and that is still becoming very true.

I may return to the United States to live. There appears yet to be some time left before things go the way of Bible prophecy. The situation in Panama seems to be more volatile than the United States, as it does elsewhere in Latin America. In many ways, there is more chance of a revolution happening here in Panama before any such an event would occur in the States. Truly from political and social index charts, Panama is being compared to its not "doing so-great" neighbors such as Mexico, Columbia, and Venezuela in several aspects. 

My experience may mirror Mike Adams, of Natural News. He spent some time in Ecuador, before getting disillusioned and returning to the United States. Basically, he said that he was tired of being a "target," and wanted to go back when he blended in as opposed to sticking out. It is kind of like the proverb--"Birds of a feather flock together," to summarize his desire to return to the States.

I know many Americans down here. The rule of thumb is, that after about two, to five years, you see what it is going on here, and you figure it is no longer for you. For diehards like me, it takes about seven. I have seen quite a few go back.


The underlying motive for me, is that I never had children before, and now, I have two. I cannot see them educated down here. The educational system is broken here, and the public schools are churning out misfits in practically every sense of the word... but it is not all their fault. The parenting here is abysmal.

For instance, kids here take English as a mandatory subject for acquiring a second language skill, which is highly needed here. They take English classes from Kindergarten to when they graduate, as a senior. This is thirteen years of English instruction. However, when they get out of school...hardly any of them can speak one legible, coherent sentence of English. Who is to blame? Primarily, the parents... many of them tell their children that English is not important!

As far as law enforcement goes... there isn't any. You can truly get away with murder here. North Americans are particularly vulnerable unless they are very conservative or circumspect with their behaviour.

As far as Panama being a refuge or haven... I cannot endorse that.
But it is the same in nearly all of Latin America, as several Americans I know, have checked out other countries down here, and end up, staying in Panama. However, Panama is a third-world country in practically every category. 

I think you would be nearly better off in an American Gulag than here in a strange land and culture where no one cares and life is much, much cheaper. Panamanians treat each other terribly. As one ex-pat told me, "the lack of compassion and courtesy (among Panamanians) is of Himalayan proportions. I have never seen anything this bad--and I have traveled quite a bit. In general, Panamanians don't treat each other very nicely."

At best, on the Marsh-Maplecroft 2014 Political Risk Map, Panama is regarded as a high medium risk for societal unrest and political instability. The United States is very low risk comparatively. Canada appears to be the safest in the world.


In Panama, which is true for much of Latin America, corruption is the predominant driving force for the widespread disregard for the rule of law which is pandemic and underlies the ability to govern equitably (BTI 2014, Panama Country Report, p.10). Corruption is a very serious threat to political stability in Panama. The "rake and pitchfork" crowd can get going in a hurry down here as seen in their ability to block major road arteries and bring the country to a virtual standstill on previous occasions in the few years that I have been here. It is unnerving at times... and really, unnecessary in a true republic.

When I came here seven years ago, I was no doubt, starry-eyed to an extent. I had fallen into the trap or belief as Rabbi Meier Kahane complained about, that most Americans and Western Europeans think that folks in other countries are just as decent as they are...

Well, Kahane was right... Many folks in foreign nations aren't as decent, kind, or have the same integrity or regard for rules or a rule of law as Americans, Canadians or Western or Northern Europeans.

When I came here seven years ago, I thought that Panama was on the cusp of a third-world nation rapidly on a different paradigm to become a second or first-world nation quickly.

I was wrong.

The very same problems that plague this nation then are still the same today. Nothing has been done of any consequence. The whole first-world possibility, or even second-world status is illusory.


Hence, for now I may stay here, or I may return to the States. Living in Panama or elsewhere is not for everyone. The United States, despite the many changes which have made its older and more traditional citizens feel more insecure, is still one of the very best countries in the world to live in.

The water here is polluted and hardly potable, electricity can go out any moment for hours without warning, computer signals can go down, and the sight of trash is everywhere as many Panamanians in the urban areas believe that water availability and refuse disposal ought to be "free" services. Although the trash problems are shown on the television news everyday, as to shame its citizens, the culture remains entrenched in abject ignorance and the trash keeps piling up, even in streams, rivers, and larger water bodies.

There are some indications that the moribund economy in the States is starting to pick up some and that home prices are increasing to a level of their former values in some locales. The "word on the street" in Panama among monied Ex-pats here, who wish to make more profits selling Panamanian real estate to gullible North Americans, is that they expect another "wave" of Americans soon who are disenchanted with the situation in the States, to be able to sell their U.S. real estate, and then come, invest and live in Panama.

In my experience, along with others, that may be a costly mistake unless they do their due diligence and research carefully the nation of Panama and their culture, people, and way of life. 

It is certainly not Kansas, and not the Land of Oz, either.

Joseph Spickard is a 'generational Christian' (2 Timothy 1:5) as his family lineage on both sides of his parentage hail from a long line of ministers and persons of faith who came to the United States in the mid-18th century and fought in the American Revolution.He is married and has two children.Mr. Spickard has been an exegete of the Bible for over forty years.He recently published his first volume on Bible prophecy, entitled, "Living in the 'End Times:' How 'End Time' Prophecy Affects...YOU!" His websites are: spickardontheprophecies and:

You can find this article permanently at

Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at

Comments for "American Expat Considers Returning Home"

Lukas said (July 30, 2014):

As an person who lived in 4 different countries so far (im 35, 8 - germany, 4 - usa - 4 ireland - rest poland) I can tell you that you have to try and make your best wherever you are. An geographical location won't give you any fulfillment or happiness (with some exceptions like war, or lets say you live in North Korea etc) That really can only come from God.
What many American expats count on, is some apocalyptic event, where the USA will be in major trouble, while other countries will be doing well. But it is very naive to believe this will be the case. Especially as an foreigner with weak social ties to the local community you will be on your own. In addition the turmoil in the US will most likely spill into the majority of the world.

Ray said (July 30, 2014):

I am a US citizen who lived the expat existence starting two weeks after 9/11/2001 until January 2013, living mostly in rural Canada but also in central Mexico and Bogota, Colombia.

Now I'm living in Blaine, Washngton, on the Canadian border, and loving being back in the good old USA. What I like most is reclaiming the many rights that I had taken for granted, but which were denied me as a foreigner living in Canada, Mexico and Colombia. I also like being able to to have anything I want delivered by Amazon within a couple of days; call me materialistic.

In addition, I discovered that Mexico is going to hell, Colombia has too much poverty and street crime and Canadians are generally too anti-American for me to feel comfortable as a long-term resident.

I still love all three of my expat countries, especially Canada, which is why I live on the border and visit Vancouver frequently.

But as for the expat existence as a way of life. twelve years was enough for me.

Dave Jason said (July 29, 2014):

Joe Spickard's experience in Panama is similar to my experience in Guatemala. Although Guatemala has high crime like Panama, it does have police, tourist cops, and military in major cities like Antigua and others. It makes no sense for authorities to not protect foreign investors as they bring in needed money and human capital. In my opinion, Canada might be one of the safest countries in the world, but has the most frightful people in the world where they are even afraid to say hello to their neighbors.

Canadians are a scared bunch afraid of their own shadows. I agree that Panama and Latin American countries are not good places to raise children, but those like me who are going to remain child-free won't have those problems. I noticed a marked amount of community spirit in Guatemala, and apparently this country has the 3rd happiest people in the world. There is a huge amount of negative press that these countries receive mainly because of media sensationalism and trying to sell more newspapers.

JG said (July 29, 2014):

I really never could quite understand how some people can just get up and go to a foreign land to reside in a country that they have no cultural or racial ties to.

As long as the US dollar is strong in Latin America I'm sure there will always be takers.
It's that heavy duty exchange rate that get's them every time.

America still has some of it's Constitutional Republic left for now but will only retain it if the people are willing to fight to preserve it and I wouldn't really bet on that happening. A lot of American's today have become complacent zombies who are drunk on meds and entertainment. Their government supports them and they're really not ready to bite the hand that feeds them quite yet.

It's always been the quality of the people who make the community what it is and not government dollars or new sports arenas.

America can never be the country it once was without having a strong Anglo Industrial Capitol presence. Capitalism has been replaced with a global economy of corporate and government welfare.

Those Anglo " lilly white" neighborhoods that was once the recognized standard of the American dream where everyone flocked to are getting harder to find. The code word for these neighborhoods is "nice areas", meaning non cosmopolitan with little or no non European integration with the exception of those with large sums of money.

Anglo Capitalist America is continuing to disappear with the remnants being dead alongside their vacant factories and once prosperous neighborhoods.

Below - ISIS Consilidates as Iraq Disintegates (scroll down)

Ayn Rand - Another Communist Jew

July 28, 2014


Has anyone
noticed that Ayn Rand's
doctrine is
characteristically Jewish?

by Henry Makow Ph.D.

Recently, I dusted off my old VCR and rediscovered my collection of movies on videotape.

When I was younger I used to scour movies for meaning and direction. I went to the theater 1-2 times a week and would purchase copies of the few films that spoke to me. Last week, I rewatched "The Passion of Ayn Rand" (1999) and was astonished at how intelligent it was. It reminded me that movies could inspire and stimulate.

Often, a new movie was an "event." It spoke to our condition.

As Cabalist possession has taken hold, art has been replaced by occultism, predictive programming, porn and social engineering.

Real art is concerned with revealing truth. The Ayn Rand movie gave my parched soul a rinse.

aaapassion.jpg(Left. Helen Mirren and Eric Stolz. Peter Fonda and Julie Delpy complete this exquisite acting ensemble. Chris Menaul directed.)

The title "Passion of Ayn Rand" is ironic because Rand didn't believe in passion. She believed in "reason." She fell in love with a disciple half her age, Nathaniel Branden, and then tried to destroy him when he dumped her for a younger woman.

The movie is based on the book by Branden's wife, Barbara, who was also a disciple and friend of Rand's. Although she too had been betrayed, she urged Rand not to destroy his career:

   Barbara Branden: I'm asking you to show compassion.
    Ayn Rand: Why?
    Barbara Branden: It's what humans do.

This cuts to the core of Ayn Rand's philosophy. She didn't believe in the existence of the soul. Our soul is our true identity. It is our connection to God, what makes us "human."

Rand didn't believe in God or religion, which she termed "the supernatural." She was a materialist. Her "reason" is totally based on the senses:
"emotion ultimately derives from the thinking one has done, or has failed to do."

(In fact, reason divorced from moral absolutes is nothing but expedience.)

aaaaynrand.jpgAs a materialist, Ayn Rand (1905-1982) was identical to a Communist. Her real name was Alice Rosenbaum and she took her name from her typewriter. She could have been Ayn Remington, but that wasn't as catchy.

In addition to being a materialist, she was like a Communist Jew in another respect. Her whole doctrine is essentially anti-Christian and ridiculed the Christian ethos.

Christ taught that the gospel of love is the path of human evolution. Love your neighbor as yourself. Be considerate. We are all part of one family. Personal and collective happiness require reciprocity.

Instead, Rand asked: "Why is it moral to serve the happiness of others, but not your own?"

I didn't know that selflessness had become a serious social problem.  Ayn Rand gave people permission to be selfish and greedy just like Freud allowed them to indulge their sexual libido.

A reader directed me to a 1928 journal entry where Rand exulted that the quote "what is good for me is right" expressed "the psychology of a real man."  What better description of the arrested development of the Cabalist Jew? See this solipsistic, narcissistic psychopathy operating in Gaza today. They're not just God's Chosen people. They're the only people.

When are Christians going to wake up and realize that Cabalist Judaism is a satanic cult, and the NWO represents its ascendency? The Illuminati will destroy the world in their quest to be God. Indeed world war may be imminent in Ukraine.

(This was an advertising slogan for Rand's novel, "Atlas Shrugged", which has sold 7 million copies)


This explains Ayn Rand's "success."

She was part of the Illuminati dialectic. On the one hand, they constructed Communism and socialism, "collectivism;" and then they used Ayn Rand to posit its dialectic opposite, Rand's "Objectivism"  a form of individualism,

But this opposition is largely specious. Both reject God and the existence of the soul. "Collectivism" is simply a means to win popular support for a totalitarian government run by Illuminati Jews and their Masonic fart catchers. Objectivism releases these billionaire Illuminati psychopaths from conscience or any social obligation.

The Cabalist Jew believes that God is formless, unknowable and not even in the world. The Cabalist Jew alone is human, and channels God's Will.

aaaatlashrugged.jpegAtlas Shrugged is a novel about business titans like John Galt who go on strike because they are hampered by government regulation.

Who is John Galt?  He is Ayn Rand. He is the Cabalist Jew who demands the world accept him as God. He is Rothschild and Rockefeller,

He is the Illuminati.


Has anyone else remarked that Ayn Rand's doctrine is
Cabalist Jewish (and satanic)?

Only Christopher Jon Bjerknes.

Ayn Rand Backs Israel as does her namesake Rand Paul (Thanks Annette)

See this interview with the engaging Nathaniel Branden who covers the same period in his book Judgment Day (1989.)

Makow- Cabalist Doctrine of Destruction is cause of human malady.
John Todd's Reference to "Atlas Shrugged" as Illuminati Codebook

First Comment by Dan:
"Her 'Objectivism' was an attempt to make a philosophy of psychopathy."

Rand swiped the maxim  "What is good for me is right" from a young man whose exploits exhilarated her during 1928.  She even started a novel about him titled, 'The Little Street'.  Probably her handler or publisher told her the public wasn't ready for that stage of enlightenment yet.  Her inspiration was William Edward Hickman - very famous that year for kidnapping a 12 year old banker's daughter from school under the pretense that her father had been injured and the girl was needed at the hospital immediately.  When the father met Hickman, he could see his daughter in Hickman's car, so he gave him the money, but Hickman drove off and dumped the girl's corpse at the end of the block.  He'd wired her eyes open to trick her father into thinking she was alive.

Rand's journals, published after her death, reveal her "passion" for the charming, cunning psychopath Hickman.   She wrote, "A wonderful, free, light consciousness" born of the utter absence of any understanding of "the necessity, meaning, or importance of other people."

William Edward Hickman was no more Jewish than Ted Bundy.   He was a psychopath.   So was Ayn Rand.  Her 'Objectivism' was an attempt to make a philosophy of psychopathy.  But I believe what John Todd said about it - she wasn't a solitary 'genius' who popped out of Russia with a new Promethean teaching from Mt. Olympus.  She was an Illuminati agent, given her mission during a sexual affair with Philip Rothschild.  Nobody seems to have traced the genealogy of this women, but isn't there a very strong sense of generational Frankist 'pragmatism' in her persona?

You can find this article permanently at

Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at

Comments for "Ayn Rand - Another Communist Jew"

Doug P said (July 30, 2014):

I think that Rands philosophy works for the business world but it is limited in that sense.

In the business world we relate by contract, not by status as many government officials would like - because it protects them from responsibility and from the burden of honest work, as Rand (correctly IMO) explained. Better to be a little bit ahead of your friends, neighbors and relatives by playing on a fixed field.

In the real world we interact at a greater level than contract. Faith exceeds material reality and shows a greater truth that is outside the bounds of reason. Rand didn't understand this, didn't understand Kant so she hated him. She had the work religion, the true spirit of the struggle for material gains and recognition, just as how Marx said we are defined.

Ron D said (July 29, 2014):

Ayn Rand's book 'the fountain head' is another codebook. In specificity it highlights the need for mediocrity and malfeasance as a system of control. This polemical work dissolute of morality demonstrates how 'middlemen' can take over any system of controls.

Looking at the CFR and Trilateral commission more than 5,000 profligate members who lack any moral fiber bow low before their Zionist Banker Masters feet. This same cadre of men and women are in the key places of world government and have announced they are 'coming out'. A new world order will rise from the ashes as they will burn it all down if necessary.

A very important book is necessary to add to one reading list is called 'Proofs of a Conspiracy' by John Robinson a Scottish Free Right Mason who was enamored by the excess and amoral nature of the French and Bavarian Illuminati. The book was written over two hundred years ago and covers the emergence of the rise of Zionist Elitism. It also covers the fact that Masonry does not end at 33 degrees. The book does not talk about witchcraft directly but one gets the strong sense the book is written from a realist point of view. So John Robinson, a man of moral fiber did not allow himself to be denigrated in the carnal goings on by these groups, or so it would appear.

Texe Marrs said (July 29, 2014):

Insightful article on Ayn Rand. You are so far ahead of others on so many things it is astounding. I have been researching Ayn Rand for some years now and believe she was a Communist agent. You are correct in labeling her exactly what she was, though she claimed to despise the Communist world.

More than that, she was most definitely a Zionist Jew nutcase. She stated in her Objectivism nonsense that she gave to no charities, didn't believe in serving anyone but herself.

BUT, she did give money to the state of Israel, which she backed 100 percent! Catch her monstrous comments about the Arabs when she was a guest on the Phil Donahue Show. She claimed they were not even humans.

Meanwhile, check out the website of her continuing organization---it is a Zionist front group, led by a Zionist Jew.



Thanks Texe

You are most generous. I tip my hat to you. The caliber and quantity of your work is unsurpassed.


CF said (July 29, 2014):

Henry, you deftly summarize the bipolar, yet unified essence of the Socialist/Communist vs. rampant, unrestrained capitalism (the Communist stereotype of the West) dialectic. All of which, when juxtaposed (as Rand did), causes a LOT of cognitive dissonance. Keeping people «dazed and confused» is part of the program.

Initially, years ago, I wanted to give Rand's Objectivist «philosophy» a chance. Instantly, there were major problems. Incredibly, painfully BAD writing; a prevailing dictatorial attitude (trashing the unselfish); and a completely imbalanced lack of simple human conscience - to name just a few.

Dealing with Rand's atheism and narcissism, all based on reason - of course, is like trying to prance over prepared hot coals (at a NLP seminar, run by some phoney with big teeth and coiffed hair); only instead of just hot coals, broken glass and rusty nails were also thrown in, for added effect.

Even if one could: Why? It's all the same poison snake oil, served by the same minions, dressed as those same hucksters... Yet, the suckers still line up.

Clearly, it doesn't take much to unleash greed in weak people, and P. Rothschild had an astonishingly LOW standard when it came to women - an effect caused by deep self-hatred, matched only by the burning hatred he had for all of humanity.

Marcos said (July 29, 2014):

Excellent article about the common core between Marxism and Objectivism.

Rand is an overestimated big mouth. Her so-called philosophy is a bunch of common sense tautology and clichés (who would be against meritocracy?) put together in order to infiltrate materialist individualism, which by no means is an obligatory consequence of merit and talent. Her thought is just an immense fallacy. Talent when shared is synergic and benefits not only the group, but it helps the source as well.

Notice that objectivism is the darling of gnostics and the basis of the "Illuminati Manifesto". The Illuminati are just parasites who would probably fail miserably as average intelligence individuals do if they didn't have their inherited money, connections and occult help. That's why they have to tell themselves all the time how superior they are. They need Ayn Rand for their psychological well being.

Debra said (July 29, 2014):

Upon her arrival to America from Russia, one of her first jobs was as an extra in the film “Ten Commandments”. How ironic, considering her philosophy broke them all. It seems she befriended Cecil B. DeMille and landed a minor writing job with the movie industry; a lucky break? Her books/writing style border on the occult being somewhat hypnotizing and full of contradictions for someone claiming an admiration for man’s ability to reason.

Nevertheless, the ability to reason is an important trait, but definitely outranked by Faith, True Love, and Charity (Love for one another) which is the total opposite of selfishness.

Robert K said (July 29, 2014):

It amazes me that in the interview of Branden he is still eulogizing Ayn Rand's apotheosis of reason. His book Judgment Day portrays her as driven ultimately by the most vicious, and destructive, emotions imaginable. She exemplified perfectly the adage that "Hell hath no fury like a woman scorned."

Dan said (July 28, 2014):

John Todd explained that Ayn Rand was Illuminati 40 years ago. More importantly, he explained the hidden agendas of the book, 'ATLAS SHRUGGED'. Please listen to this clip. Then download all the half hour tapes.

John Todd on Ayn Rand and ATLAS SHRUGGED, (1979)

Before anyone pops off that John Todd was a 'fake', I heard this 1979 tape in 1980, when Todd was only heard of through the occult grapevine. At the time I could tell he know a great deal - but I dismissed it and forgot about it. Thirty years later I found the tapes uploaded on the internet, and now on Youtube. I can attest that everything he said that I thought was ridiculous in 1980 has come to pass.

Below - ISIS Consolidates While Iraq Disintegrates (scroll down)

Televangelist's "Death" Gives Pope Credibility

July 27, 2014


"With 100% surety I can state that the Pope is following "The Plan" to install the anti-Christ into global rule."

Illuminati defector Carolyn Hamlett discusses how the controversy over "Bishop" Tony Palmer's "death" might advance the Illuminati agenda.

by Carolyn Hamlett


Richard Evan's insightful article on Pope Francis' flirtation with sleazy televangelists accurately portrays the players for what they are. People need to hear the truth. Unfortunately there are too few people who care enough for their fellow man to stand up, stick their neck out and speak the truth to anything which involves that Goliath of the Vatican.  

I realize that on the surface this move of ecumenicalism appears Godly and wholesome. It's designed that way. However, those who know and serve "The Plan", know the endgame of this seemingly good promotion of global peace. The religious unity which the Pope has been promoting is in complete agreement and alignment with "The Plan" for globalization known as the NWO.  With 100% surety I can state that the Pope is following "The Plan" to install the anti-Christ into global rule. 

In my July 6th blog article, "Will There Be A Global "Sunday Law"?,  I detailed how the plan for globalism operates to achieve the goals which were mapped out many years ago.  Much of this step by step plan was explained to me in 1957.  I have witnessed this plan unfold as I was told it would. 

To give the readers some insight into the Pope's move toward ecumenicalism and the endgame, here are some excerpts from my June 15th article.

"Nearly 60 years ago, when "The Plan" was laid out to me, I was told that in the latter section of "The Plan", as a means to prepare the masses to embrace the global spirituality to be brought in with Lucifer's chosen "Christ", religious leaders will meet to begin promoting spiritual unity of faiths. (We are seeing this now.) Though the purpose is to appear as promoting global peace, the plan for the future of this ecumenicism is sinister. 

The plan is to condition the masses to believe that global peace can not be achieved without the unity of all faiths. 

This conditioning of the masses will continue until the majority of the world's population is convinced that global peace is being held back from them by a minority of selfish, unloving, willfully ignorant closed minded, spiritually inferior people stuck in their outdated fundamentalist Christian belief system and too stuborn to give it up.

Finally, the peoples of the world will agree to exterminate the few for the greater good of the many.  My mother called this "a compassionate plan within "The Plan"."

"The way of "The Plan" is to gently stroke the masses with suggestions. The suggestions are gradually increased and plugged where ever possible by way of TV, radio, books, and movies. This primes the masses to be open and ready to embrace the final suggestion."

"I believe we will be seeing more and more reference suggesting that Sunday is the preferred "Holy-day"..or more like 'holiday" of rest.  The Pope and other religious and political leaders will be priming the masses with talks of peace and ecumenicalism. Again, as I said before, Lucifer/Satan works through his people to make his plan for his global rulership a physical reality."

(End of quotes from my June 15th article.)


Now, on the wake of the publicized death of Tony Palmer and the rumors that he may still be alive, I have been asked by numerous people to share my thoughts on this topic....

1.) My first reaction when I heard of the accident which took the life of Tony Palmer, was shock. No doubt it was the same sort of shock many people experienced upon hearing the news. It was flat out shocking news. It was hard to picture Tony Palmer in any other way than the way we all had seen him, alive and smiling.  

2.) The next thought that came to me was the question, cui bono? ("Who benefits?" or "To whose benefit?") I was suspicious of foul play. 

Who was to benefit by such a terrible thing? 

I had my thoughts on that too, however I am sure it is more complicated than meets the eye. 

Often, the evidence of who benefits doesn't become apparent until time moves on. 

This I have noticed so far:

The publicized death of Tony Palmer, has indirectly kept alive in peoples minds the topic of the Pope, the suggested Sunday observance and the ecumenical movement, coming from a different angle which keeps the masses attention.

As I mentioned in my July 6th article, the anti-Christ organization works through the media to sway the thoughts and opinions of the masses toward target goals. This is done through suggestions which are gradually increased over time to get the masses conditioned to a certain thought or idea. 

A typical tactic of the organization is to plug an idea through a news topic, then back off from that news topic and come back from a different angle which keeps the original plugged idea still fresh in the minds of the masses. 

I see a typical pattern emerging which involves the announcement of the death of Tony Palmer. 

Last month, what do you suppose most people thought of when the name of Tony Palmer came up?

Most likely, The Pope and the ecumenical movement. 

Now, today, what do you suppose most people think of when the name of Tony Palmer comes up? 

Most likely, The Pope and the ecumenical movement.   

The organization is all about selling their product and keeping the masses captive. They know when it is time to dim the spot light on one act and direct everyone's attention to a side act or diversion. The globalists know all about mind control and how to work the masses. It hasn't taken long to reduce the majority of Americans into the planned 21st century entertainment junkies who are like vampires needing their next adrenal fix. The globalist run media is more than happy to keep them hooked up, but not without a price. 

3.) The next thought I had when I heard of Tony Palmer's death was that often when something big like this hits the airwaves, it is used as a diversion to keep the masses occupied while something even more sinister is being pulled off some where else in global politics. I will leave this up to my readers to see if this applies to this event. 


Several days ago I heard there was a rumor that Tony Palmer was not deceased, and that his death was a contrived lie. I have to admit I was shocked a 2nd time. I wondered if there was any truth to the rumor and if so, cui bono? Who was reaping the benefits of this lie and for what purpose? 

All I had was a rumor of a rumor until Chris Hudson aka. "Forerunner 777" released his video update on Tony Palmer.  This video records conversations Chris and his associate had with different switchboard operators at the hospital where Tony Palmer was reportedly admitted and pronounced dead later that same day. 

The switchboard operators all reported the same info, that Tony Palmer was admitted and released alive the same day he was admitted.


So, now what do we have?

My first thought is that the organization which has vested interest in Tony Palmer is not so sloppy as to claim Tony Palmer is deceased and yet have conflicting switchboard information which listed him as being discharged. 

For what ever reason this discrepancy has occurred, several things are obvious to me. 

1.) This news item keeps the masses occupied with thoughts of Tony Palmer and his work toward ecumenicalism. This in turn indirectly keeps the Pope in the spotlight without having to tire the masses with too much repeat of the same information staring the Pope.

2.) It is possible that something else of a larger scale is being pulled off while we are all occupied with the discrepancy over Tony Palmer's accident.

3.) The discrepancy is also an open door for the organization to use as an opportunity to poke fun at "conspiracy theorists" which will gain strength in the official story of Tony's death, which will gain strength in what Tony Palmer stood for, which will strengthen the positive public view of the Pope and all that Pope is working for.  

Here's how that can happen: 

The masses have been conditioned to associate the term "conspiracy theorists" to "nut cases" and unstable people. Whenever the media pokes fun at "conspiracy theorists", the effect is that people see two sides to an issue, one that the media supports and the other which belongs to the "crazies".  

If the media uses the "conspiracy theorists" tactic, more people are likely to start taking stock in the media's view of the Pope rather than identify themselves with a "minority" which includes the "crazies".

By casting the Pope as being in one camp and the crazy "conspiracy theorists" as being the other camp, the easily-led of the masses will identify the Pope as the opposite of the crazies. They will see the Pope as a man of integrity, wisdom, sound mind, rational thinking, logic, level headedness, sensibility and trustworthiness. They will follow the Pope who follows "The Plan" which is the plan for the NWO and the plan to instal Lucifer's "Christ" (chosen one) in global power who will be a wolf in sheep's clothing.

What I have been sharing here is insight I have from my own personal experience of being a bloodline server to this  Luciferian/Satanic conspiracy to put the anti-Christ into global rule. I was one of a long line of conspirators working my assignments, doing my small part until God stepped in and changed my life forever.  I share with the readers what I know from the enemy's camp so they will not be deceived by the tactics being employed against them.  I point the readers to the King of Kings, Jesus Christ who is Salvation and the key to defeat the enemy. 

Carolyn Hamlett is a former "Illuminist" born and raised in the Luciferian organization responsible for implementing the plan for the NWO. Carolyn was used throughout her life in various capacities and departments in "The Plan" which yielded to her a wide range of experiences and privy to classified information.  Her web site is

You can find this article permanently at

Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at

Comments for "Televangelist's "Death" Gives Pope Credibility"

Greg said (July 28, 2014):

I also am a Roman Catholic through my own choice because I believe in Jesus and his teachings. If the Catholic church was a man made institution it would have never gotten off the ground, let alone have flourish over the past two thousand years. No doubt there have been many bad men in the Catholic church and many attempts have been made to subvert it. The teachings of Christ hold just as true today as they did at the times of Christ.

If the rc church were a man-made institution with earth bound goals then I’d agree with Hamlett, because everything man does by himself turns into chaos and decay.

The other shoe is that all the good that comes from the church gets totally ignored because its not exciting to feed and care for people.

Frank said (July 28, 2014):

It does appear to me that hec could have indeed been "offed" or disappearerd to further distance the Vatican from them "charizzmatics" that are just baggage for the Pope to deal with. The Joe Sixpack Catholics wont like a Pope hanging with that crowd...and they needed Palmer to bridge that gap to Rome for them. Its really sad and pathetic ,the need to belong to "something bigger" being exhibited by Copeland and Robison, et al. The falling away ,in action,before our very eyes...

RR said (July 28, 2014):

The so-called protestant churches have been giving the pope credibility for generations, with their adherence to Romish dogma. Sunday-keeping, observance of seasons, (Easter, Christmas, etc... paganism) while the Romans laugh their asses off at their 'protests'.

Whatever happened with Palmer, the death knell of Christianity was sounded ages ago. While there will always be a remnant, the majority won't hear the truth. It's always been about Satan vs. Christ, the former has always hated the latter for his expulsion from Heaven. The stupid Zionists and their patsies that have unwittingly given their lives over to this self-absorbed and insane former covering cherub, will soon realize their 'company pension plan' isn't worth shit.

The Great Controversy will soon come to an end. There is going to be collateral damage in the multiple billions, but, the universe will once again be clean. My assurance in all of this is summed up in Nahum 1:9, no matter which side I come out on.

Mary said (July 28, 2014):

These are the very people Jesus spoke about gathering together on the final judgement and demand in the very presence of God to let them pass into Heaven, all saying they helped cast evil out of the world. Pins and Camels time.
Most of them are the soothe sayers and Satanists Christ warned about that would appear during the end times who not preach spiritual growth, but instead make money selling self-worshipping books like, “I AM.”

These days, when young people today need God’s direction more than ever are not getting the proper spiritual advice by these false prophets for profit. Jesus smashed the money tables for good reason. He knew money is the root of all evil that satan needed to destroy mankind. With the increasing struggle against Satan the modern televangelist demented teachings of cherishing wealth and materialism is the new way to happiness and salvation is yet another sign the devil knows time is almost up. You cannot climb two mountains at the same time.


July 24, 2014




that a woman

capable of so much love

for a man

should lose him

in the senseless war

in Iraq

Women like Cats? A Defense of Cats! by Annette

July 13, 2014

img142.jpgLeft, A  photo of the sweetheart who protected our family as valiantly as any dog. The kids used to sneak her into the house. They placed the crown on her and took the pic. She deserved it.

Annette's Response to  "Men are like Dogs; Women Like Cats"

Oh brother Henry, I can't believe I am writing  you again over all this nonsense , but here goes again. Geeeez this business about women and cats... I won't start or even end my rebuttal on the woman part. I'm here to defend cats !

We have had four cats in our family and every one of them was an amazing loving being. The guy who wrote the article obviously not only hates women - he hates cats too !

All of my kitties were stray, abused or unwanted by neighbors. We loved them and treated them with respect and they returned everything a thousand-fold. Both of my female cats showed incredible loyalty and protectiveness.

One cat, if we were out in front as a family would run to the end of the driveway to attack any dog walking by in a show of protectiveness towards us. She put her life in jeopardy by doing that.

Other times when my husband would lose his temper with the kids, the same kitty would come and show concern and try to get in between my husband and our kids. Again the same kitty would follow me to a neighbor's where I took piano lessons and wait for me on the front porch until I came out and then escort me home.

My other female cat left my neighbors and came to live at our house because she had been abused by them. She was terrified of them and the dogs they had brought into their home, and yet in a display of protectiveness towards me, she would growl when she heard their voices over the fence. I think it was all show, as  she was very frightened and timid. But she was showing me where her loyalties lay.

These cats would follow us around the yard or house as we did work or chores just to be in our company.  Cats give back what you give them- that is my experience. 

Yes dogs have some wonderful qualities but they can be totally gross and obnoxious, and vicious. No animal control ever had to put a cat down for an unprovoked attack on a child or adult. Once again some guy had problems with women and instead of contemplating himself has to demonize not only women , but for god sakes cats too ! What a loser. I'm all for hearing genuine complaints from men, but this is misogyny and not worthy of linking to your site. The coward wouldn't even sign his name to the blog.
Remember this good for nothing cat that saved a little boy's life ?   I rest my case.

Carolyn Hamlett Replies to a Reader

July 10, 2014

Carolyn Hamlett (2).jpg

Carolyn Hamlett replies to a reader who asked
 how she had the nostalgia for America
described in this July 4 article, if she were
undergoing MK-Ultra programming.
(See, Underground Pedophilia: A Victim's Memoir)

Reader's Comment:

(Henry, off the record - I thought Carolyn Hamlett said that in 1958 she was being programmed with 'kitten' training by Illuminati handlers in secret underground MKULTRA facilities    -  did I miss something? I guess one of her 'alters' wrote the current article! )

Carolyn's Response:

Yes, you did "miss something", actually quite a few some things, but that is understandable. Many people are familiar with a few terms, such as "kitten", "programming", "alters", "handlers", MKULTRA, and yet not understand some of the very basics.  

First of all, I have never used the term, "kitten" to describe any of my programming.

I have mentioned an underground facility where one type of "education" took place. That "education" was a type of programming, but nothing compared to the complexity of other types of programming that I was subjected to.

Secondly, it appears that you are either under the assumption that programmed children do not have a life outside of the programming facilities, or that programmed children are not capable of blending in with other children and appearing normal in all ways.

It is true that some children lived at the facilities where training or programming took place. Those children had no life outside of the facility such as family and school.  I saw many such children.

There were other children who were taken from their homes at night, usually by adult family members, to various places for programming, experimentation and rituals. I was one of these children. I had a good life outside of the facilities.

Last year, Daniel Duval helped me lay down some highlights of my life story by way of 7 interviews (available on YouTube) and yet we only scratched the surface on some topics and other areas we didn't cover at all. Some of the areas not covered have to do with my early childhood programming and the areas I was used in. I was not used in just one capacity, I was used in numerous areas and experienced some very complex programming. I was fully capable of carrying out more than a double life. The only surface side effect I had was fatigue, which I ignored. Children like myself were trained to ignore pain and fatigue.

In answer to your comment that you "guess one of her [my] alters wrote the article!":

This last statement of yours most especially sounds like it is coming from a person who is totally ignorant of high level programming, ignorant of the selection process of those chosen to undergo high level programming and ignorant of the dynamics of alter systems.  

The best way I know to describe myself is that I have what some would say is a strong core personality. I do have alter systems and at times another alter or two will be in the front with my core. My core personality has always had the memories of the everyday life I led. The articles I wrote about my childhood memories are my memories, just as I experienced them back in the early years of my life.

Though I am now in the autumn years of my life, that little girl who lived in the late 1950's and early 1960's is still me. Maybe many people my age have forgotten our true golden years, but for me, those memories are forever etched in my very soul. I can not read my article about the 4th of July without crying. It's because I truly morn the loss of what America used to be! America was a country where common sense was common and the majority of the citizens were people of integrity having strong moral character. The fact that I was used in government projects did not affect my ability to love my life, my country and the people around me.  

When I wrote the articles, I was hoping to refresh the dying memories of the readers of my generation and at the same time, paint an accurate picture to the younger generations, of the days when life for most Americans was good.