Archeological Finds Disprove Darwinism
March 10, 2010
Humans Inhabited Earth for Millions of YearsMasons Try to Suppress Evidence
"Anatomically modern humans have been present on the Earth not just for 100,000 years or less (the orthodox version), but for millions of years, and that metal objects of advanced design have been in use at equally early periods."
by Cornelius B
(for henrymakow.com)
The model of human prehistory built-up by scholars over the past two centuries is sadly and completely wrong, and a deliberate tool of disinformation and mind control.
This is the thesis of the essay, "Forbidden Archaeology" by Michael Cremo and Richard L. Thompson (http://www.
The authors begin with the assumption that archeologists are fundamentally of good faith. Nevertheless, little by little, they demonstrate a systematic destruction of proofs that show another reality than that the official story. Falsifications and even destruction of such proofs has been common for more than two hundred years.
In their first essay "The
Hidden History of the Human Race", Cremo and Thompson push back our horizons not just thousand years, but millions
of years into the past, and show that almost everything we have been
taught to believe about the origins and evolution of our species rests
on a highly selective
sampling of research.
The two authors then set the record straight by showing all the other research results that have been edited out, not because there was anything wrong about them, but simply because "they did not fit with prevailing academic opinion."
Anomalous and out-of-place
discoveries reported by Cremo
and Thompson in "The Hidden History of the Human Race" include
convincing evidence that anatomically modern humans have been present
on the Earth not just for 100,000 years or less (the orthodox version),
but for millions of years, and that metal objects of advanced design
have been in use at equally early periods.
SCIENTIFIC CENSORSHIP
The authors describe an ongoing social process of knowledge filtration that at first sight appears quite innocuous, but has a substantial cumulative effect. Certain categories of evidence simply disappear from view.
This pattern of data suppression has been going on for a long time. For instance, in 1880, J. D. Whitney, the state geologist of California, published a lengthy review of advanced stone tools found in California gold mines. The implements, including spear points and stone mortars and pestles, were found deep in mine shafts, underneath thick, undisturbed layers of lava, in formations ranging from 9 million to over 55 million years old.
W. H. Holmes of the Smithsonian Institution, one of the most vocal critics of these California finds, wrote:
"Perhaps if Professor Whitney had fully appreciated the story of human evolution as it is understood today, he would have hesitated to announce the conclusions formulated (that humans existed in very ancient times in North America), notwithstanding the imposing array of testimony with which he was confronted."
In other words, if the facts do not agree with the favored theory, then such facts, even an imposing array of them, must be discarded.
I shall give here some examples of these discarded paleo-archaeological elements:
In a report delivered to the British Association for the Advancement of Science in 1881, H. Slopes, F.G.S. (Fellow of the Geological Society), described a shell, the surface of which bore a carving of a crude but unmistakably human face. The carved shell was found in the stratified deposits of the Red Crag, which is between 2.0 and 2.5 million years old.
One should keep in mind that
in terms of conventional paleontological opinion, one does not
encounter such works of art until the time of fully modern Cro-Magnon
man in the Late Pleistocene, about 30,000 years ago.
On August 2, 1890, J. H. Neale signed the following statement about discoveries made by him:
"In 1877 Mr. J. H. Neale was superintendent of the Montezuma Tunnel Company, and ran the Montezuma tunnel into the gravel underlying the lava of Table Mountain, Tuolumne County. . . . At a distance of between 1400 and 1500 feet from the mouth of the tunnel, or of between 200 and 300 feet beyond the edge of the solid lava, Mr. Neale saw several spear-heads, of some dark rock and nearly one foot in length.
On exploring further, he himself found a small mortar three or four inches in diameter and of irregular shape. This was discovered within a foot or two of the spear-heads. He then found a large well formed pestle, now the property of Dr. R. I. Bromley, and near by a large and very regular mortar, also at present the property of Dr. Bromley."
Neale's affidavit continued:
"All of these relics were found. . . . close to the bed-rock, perhaps within a foot of it. Mr. Neale declares that it is utterly impossible that these relics can have reached the position in which they were found excepting at the time the gravel was deposited, and before the lava cap formed. There was not the slightest trace of any disturbance of the mass or of any natural fissure into it by which access could have been obtained either there or in the neighborhood."
The position of the artifacts
in gravel close to the bedrock at Tuolumne Table Mountain indicates
they were 33-55 million years old.
In 1844, Sir David Brewster reported that a nail had been discovered firmly embedded in a block of sandstone from the Kingoodie (Mylnfield) Quarry in Scotland. Dr. A. W. Medd of the British Geological Survey wrote to the authors in 1985 that this sandstone is of "Lower Old Red Sandstone age" (Devonian, between 360 and 408 million years old). Brewster was a famous Scottish physicist. He was a founder of the British Association for the Advancement of Science and made important discoveries in the field of optics.
In his report to the British Association for the Advancement of Science, Brewster stated:
"The stone in Kingoodie quarry consists of alternate layers of hard stone and a soft clayey substance called 'till'; the courses of stone vary from six inches to upwards of six feet in thickness. The particular block in which the nail was found, was nine inches thick, and in proceeding to clear the rough block for dressing, the point of the nail was found projecting about half an inch (quite eaten with rust) into the 'till,' the rest of the nail lying along the surface of the stone to within an inch of the head, which went right down into the body of the stone."
The fact that the head of the
nail was buried in the sandstone block would seem to rule out the possibility
the nail had been pounded into the block after it was quarried.
On June 22, 1844, this curious report appeared in the London Times:
"A few days ago, as some workmen were employed in quarrying a rock close to the Tweed about a quarter of a mile below Rutherford-mill, a gold thread was discovered embedded in the stone at a depth of eight feet."
Dr. A. W. Medd
of the British Geological Survey wrote to the authors in 1985 that this
stone is of Early Carboniferous age (between 320 and 360 million years
old).
(Ed. Note: Cornelius B cites many more examples which I excised in the interest of brevity.)
DISINFORMATION AND MIND CONTROL
"Forbidden Archeology" was first released in 1993 and quickly became an underground classic. Today it is a bestseller, with foreign editions in over a dozen languages, presenting both accepted and anomalous scientific evidence defying the traditional view of human evolution. This is a fascinating intellectual excavation of a vast store of hidden knowledge.
I'll let you judge their proofs sustaining the human evolution. What is the purpose behind this disinformation if not mind control, and therefore social engineering?
Science is a method that anyone can learn and apply. In a free and open society, science has to be a democratic process. Instead, we observe a behavior similar to the totalitarian attitude of the ancient priesthood clique in Egypt. To better illustrate this affirmation, I present the case of a science journalist, Richard Milton, initially an ardent believer in Darwinian doctrine until his investigative instincts kicked in one day.
After 20 years of studying and writing about evolution, he suddenly
realized that there were many disconcerting elements in the theory.
He decided to put every main classic proof
of Darwinism to the test. The results were hard to believe -- he found
that the theory could not even stand up to the rigors of routine investigative
journalism. Next, he published a book titled "The
Facts of Life: Shattering the Myths of Darwinism".
Milton says:
"I experienced the witch-hunting activity of the Darwinist police at first hand - it was deeply disappointing to find myself being described by a prominent Oxford zoologist, Richard Dawkins, as "loony", "stupid" and "in need of psychiatric help" in response to purely scientific reporting."
Does this sound like stories
that came out of the Soviet Union 25 years ago when dissident scientists
there started speaking out?
Without a
doubt Dawkins is part of the "secret societies brotherhood" invested
with high power. Richard Dawkins has been appointed to the position of Professor of the
Public Understanding of Science at Oxford University. This advocate of aetheism is a classic
"Brain Police" storm-trooper, patrolling the neurological
front lines.
According to Milton, the process came to a head when the London Times
Higher Education Supplement commissioned him to write a critique of
Darwinism. The publication foreshadowed his coming piece: "Next
Week: Darwinism - Richard Milton goes on the attack". Dawkins caught
wind of this and wasted no time in nipping this heresy in the bud. He
contacted the editor, Auriol Stevens, and accused Milton of being a
"creationist", and prevailed upon Stevens to pull the plug
on the article. Milton learned of this behind-the-scenes backstabbing
and wrote a letter of appeal to Stevens. In the end, she caved in to
Dawkins and scratched the piece.
DARWINISM AS MIND CONTROL
The Western scientific establishment and mass media pride themselves
on being open public forums devoid of prejudice or censorship. However,
no television program examining the flaws and weaknesses of Darwinism
has ever been aired in Darwin's home country or in America. A scientist
who opposes the theory cannot get a paper published.
Darwin's theory of evolution is the only theory routinely taught in
our public school system that has never been subjected to rigorous scrutiny;
nor have any of the criticisms been allowed into the curriculum. This
is an interesting fact, because a recent poll showed that "71%
of the American public say biology teachers should teach both Darwinism
and scientific evidence against Darwinian theory." Nevertheless,
there are no plans to implement this balanced approach.
Then there is the high-profile case of Dr
Virginia Steen-McIntyre, a geologist working for the US Geological
Survey (USGS), who was dispatched to an archaeological site in Mexico
to date a group of artifacts in the 1970s. This travesty also illustrates
how far the « brothers scientists" will go to guard orthodox tenets.
McIntyre used state-of-the-art equipment and backed up her results by
using four different methods, but her results were off the chart. The
lead archaeologist expected a date of 25,000 years or less, and the
geologist's finding was 250,000 years or more.
The figure of 25,000 years or less was critical to the Bering Strait
"crossing" theory, and it was the motivation behind the head
archaeologist's tossing Steen-McIntyre's results in the circular file
and asking for a new series of dating tests. This sort of reaction does
not occur when dates match the expected chronological model that supports
accepted theories.
Steen-McIntyre was given a chance to retract her conclusions, but because
this woman was intellectually honest, she refused. She found it hard
thereafter to get her papers published and she lost a teaching job at
an American university.
CONCLUSION
Thus, as we may conclude from the information provided here, Darwinism, the theory of the survival of the fittest and its twin sister, the theory of human evolution, together with the official version of the Paleontology and Archaeology such as they are practiced, are pseudo-sciences.
In fact, they are tools for mind control of the masses. Their main purpose is to cut off the roots of the true history of humanity, and promote a naturalistic and mechanistic view of life as "survival of the fittest." They promote atheism as a means of destroying Christian civilization.
We find the same hate of God and of Christianity in Marxism and Freudianism.
A very interesting read is the book of Richard Wurmbrand "Marx & Satan" where we discover that Marx was a Satanist priest with a deep hate of God and desire for the ruin and annihilation of the human society. How can we explain this deep hated nourished in the hearts of these men? Was it satanic possession?
I will close with this fact -- at the funerals of Karl
Marx, in his speech Frederich Engels compared Marx to Darwin
as titans of the human mind, and this suggests the high probability that Darwin was Karl Marx's "Luciferian brother".
You can find this article permanently at http://www.henrymakow.com/forbidden_archeology.html
Comments for "Archeological Finds Disprove Darwinism"
Will said (March 11, 2010):
Not only do archaeological finds disprove Darwinism, but there is no proof of macro-evolution (species to species mutation) whatsoever. Of course species adapt to their environments and their characteristics can change over time, but there is no evidence in the fossil record or anywhere else to prove that one species transforms into another.
The complete title of Darwin's book is, "On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favored Races in the Struggle for Life." Darwin was a renowned racist looking for a scientific excuse for slavery and genocide of "undesirable" and "inferior" races. Evolution has been used to justify every major genocide and wicked philosophy--i.e. Naziism, stalinism, communism--in history by killing off the weak.
Evolution makes a hero out of death and completely negates all morality and humane compassion. When you tell people that they are evolved animals that are floating on a lawless and indifferent planet in outer space they begin to act as just that--lawless animals with no morality or accountability for themselves.
DNA is proof of a designer. The number of chromosomes from everything from a tomato, to a dog, to a human vary so drastically; there is no evidence of an upward evolutionary progression. To quote another: if you saw a painting or a statue in the forest and there was no one to be seen for 100s of miles, would you assume that it happened all by itself or that it had a creator? DNA is so mind-bogglingly complex that it proves a creator. Don't you think people's self-esteem and moral conviction would be higher if they were taught that they were designed in the image of God rather than freaks of nature that evolved from a rock billions of years ago?
This is how the illuminati want us to view ourselves.
Dr. Kent Hovind, who was framed for tax evasion and is now in prison, has over 17 hours of video in which he disproves every "proof" or argument for evolution. He has successfully debated top scientists and offered a $250,000 reward for proof of evolution. His debates and articles can be found at www.drdino.com and www.freehovind.com.
Evolution is the most effective means of destroying peoples faith in God and in the basis for absolute morality. As Hovind says "if there is no God, then how do you determine right from wrong?" And who determines it? Our satanic politicians who molest children? Evolution is one of the "strong delusions" now face. People "professing themselves wise have become fools.""Who turned the truth into a lie and worshiped the creature more than the creator?"
Evolution is satanic at worst and foolish at best. It is used by guilt-ridden and immoral people to justify their sinful lifestyles and sexual perversions. Period. Evolution gives people a rational excuse to live like godless, materialistic and selfish animals.
Dan said (March 11, 2010):
The judeo / christian view of history IS NOT diametrically opposed to the theory of evolution. This is classic hegelian dialectic. Both arguments are "Mind control" as stated by their respective orthodox authorities.
Successive generations of cockroaches become increasingly resistant to poison till finally they become immune.
This is obvious proof of the theory of evolution right there.
So it applies when it applies.
We are putting fish genes in tomatoes.
We breed dogs.(split from wolves 90,000 years ago, ain't that a Monkey wrench)
We put spider genes into goats.
This is intelligent(sic) design.
So it applies when it applies.
Reading Velikovski and everyone that followed him, ( and noting all the underwater remains of habitation around the world ) we find that catastrophism ( from whatever cause - meteors, the regular glacial cycle, Man's use of DU or GMO...etc )is the prime element of change in the world.
Of course while everyone is tied up in knots of "belief" ( believing and knowing are two different things) the perpetrators of this confusion realise that along with the hard wired genetics of life the "programming" of the intelligence that goes along with every life form is half the factor in how the creature evolves.
So the so called "illuminati", who think that their programming is uncorrupted hope to evolve to the top, whilst those they falsely program, they hope shall devolve to the bottom.
Vance said (March 11, 2010):
This longish paper crossed my path a few weeks ago. Using current scientific findings it shows how the evolutionary model is not supported by facts. Having never really thought to seriously question evolutionary theory before, this paper has profoundly shaken my long held beliefs.
About half way through the paper is a mind-boggling description of the folding of amino acid ribbons into proteins, using chaperone proteins,
"Chaperones can keep proteins separated from each other while they are folding, prevent mistakes in folding, and even unfold mistakes to give the protein a second chance to get it right. After helping one protein fold, a chaperone will go help another one fold."
http://www.newgeology.us/presentation32.html
Jeff said (March 11, 2010):
I very much enjoyed the above referenced article. Without going into detail, it is obvious to anyone that has done any kind of honest research that archeological fraud and deceit are commonplace in the scientific community, particularly with regards to Darwinism.
I have a Masters degree in Physics from the Georgia Institute of Technology and I too accepted Darwinism as a young man. It was only later when I looked into the theory myself that I saw it for what it is, completely unsupported by the scientific evidence, both archaeological and biological.
I consider myself an unbiased observer, as my world view is not influenced in any way by whatever the truth may be. Indeed, even as a believer in the theory as a young man, my faith in God/Creator was not affected in the least. Who am I to tell God what he can or can not do, or did or did not do, with his Universe? But the truth is that so little evidence exists to support the theory that it should have been discarded long ago, or at least accepted for what it is, a wholly unsupported theory. That the scientific community continues to shout that the theory is somehow scientific fact is intellectual dishonesty at its worst.
Macro evolution, the origin of life, the fossil and geological record, the incredible complexity of living organisms, the fact that DNA contains information, all of these things and much more cast serious doubt on the validity of Darwinism, yet it continues to be accepted as truth by its supporters and the scientific community.
It is interesting that even among supporters of Darwinism, some of them have honestly stated that so little evidence exists to support the theory and it simply must be accepted as a matter of faith. A little bit of unbiased research and intellectual honesty is all that is needed to realize that Darwinism, as presently accepted, is seriously flawed.
Richard Dawkins is widely regarded as one of the leading experts and supporters of Darwinism. But as a self avowed militant atheist, how can anyone say that he can even begin to be unbiased with regards to objectively evaluating the evidence? The truth is that he cannot, and he is nothing more than the atheists version of the very worst Christian televangelists. His book "The God Delusion" is so poorly written that I actually found myself laughing out loud while reading it. I dare anyone to support that book as anything more than ideological ranting. It is certainly far from high level intellectual thought. I actually believe that an average 8th grader could have written a more well reasoned and logical argument.
M said (March 11, 2010):
http://www.amazon.com/Upright-Ape-New-Origin-Species/dp/1564149331
Take a look at the Upright Ape by Filler. Serious study which says man is twenty million years old, and modern apes descended from man.
Michael said (March 11, 2010):
In case this may be of interest,here is a potential alternative scientific hypothesis to Evolution Theory, which -
1. Offers a logical explanation to the appearances of the Ufos, over the millennia, especially since 1945 and Hiroshima - ' the oh my god the kids have found the matches', stage in the development of our humanity
2. Once one understands the scientific predictability that our humanity finds itself in today, then the ORIGINAL 'good measure' intent, behind all the religions becomes more clear; to precipitate a capacity within our humanity to survive and cope with this predictable period, which we entered in 1945,on our own.
This is against a backdrop of our planet being very ancient, and upon which there have been many humanities, which have disappeared for the self-evident treasons we can understand today.Progressive evolution of design, evidenced by the theory of evolution, is in this theory progressive evolution of design by advanced science over some 12000 years, followed by the creation of the first man and 13000 years of history.
www.1945-666.com OR www.ufos-evolutionmyth.com
Mark said (March 11, 2010):
great article from your corespondent
talked to Cremo on the phone years ago. nice guy
forbidden archeology is okay
but an even better book is genesis giants by steve quayle
you'd really like it
and it should be read in conjunction with nephilim stargates by tom horn
these two books clarify much
Jerry said (March 11, 2010):
I hope all is well with you and thank you for stirring things up! I've been a general contractor since 1972 and five years into my career I received a phone call from my excavator asking me to come to the excavation site stating he had a bit of problem that I had to address. He was excavating for a house foundation on the west side of downtown Cincinnati.
When I arrived Bobby, the excavator, said nothing he simply met me at my truck and said I want you to see something. We exchanged pleasantries as we walked over to the edge of the foundation excavation which at the time was 6'-6'' below the natural grade. I looked down into the 80' by 40' hole and was stunned to see what appeared to be a stone paved road.
I had a fascination, as a boy, for arrowheads, but never gave archaeology much thought until this excavation revealed the anomaly fore mentioned. Bobby and I went down into the hole and studied the apparent pavers. They were definitely man made and skillfully cut and placed in place. The front end loader had excavated a small area or cross section of the road and there was a 12" gravel base beneath the pavers.
The road seemed to be headed northwest and so I instructed Bobby to keep excavating the assumed road (approx. 60'). We reached the property line and stopped for obvious reasons. I called the University of Cincinnati, department of archaeology, they were not interested.
The material strata was 2 feet of black humus topsoil and about 4'-6" of brown and blue clay. The road pavers varied from 6" to 7'' in thickness. The pavers were 8" to 14" in length and 6" to 8" in width. There were various other sizes, but the sizes I mentioned were dominate. The pavers were placed on top of one foot of fine gravel and sand.
Conclusion: The University wasn't interested so I assumed that the road was not ancient and that somehow the road got covered up and forgotten. Years latter I would recall this road and began to realize that I had never seen a limestone paver road in Cincinnati. Brick streets were still common in the downtown area and there were even 6"x6" granite pavers in some parts of the downtown Cincinnati. Today all that is left of the granite street paves are the ones salvaged and used to pave the famous Fountain Square Plaza. The stone pavers at the excavation site were made of limestone, a common regional material that often protruded from the hillsides of Cincinnati. But, as I said I have never seen limestone paved streets in Cincy.
You are correct. If an archaeological discovery is outside of the academic standard, its ignored or ridiculed. Ugh!