Sorry, you need to update your flash player to view this flash animation. You may download the flash player from here. However, you should still be able to view the rest of this page.

Below-- "Opus Dei- Catholic Church Embraces Satanic Cult" (scroll down)

Bigger Text | Default Text | Smaller Text |

Bursting the Malachi Martin Bubble

March 17, 2010

MartinMalachiFr(2).gifby Henry Makow Ph.D.


Powerful forces have maintained the fiction that Malachi Martin left the Jesuit Order voluntarily or on principle. In fact, this prominent church critic was forced to leave the priesthood because he was a scoundrel and a philanderer.

By 1962, he had alienated the affections of at least four housewives and then dropped them.

When one spurned woman asked Martin's brother in Dublin where Malachi was, she was told: 

"Dear girl. I don't know. I must tell you, you are the fourth woman who has come here asking me the same question about  Malachi. All of them have essentially the same story to tell. That they were in love with Malachi and thought Malachi was in love with them."

"Four woman?" she demanded. "The same story?"

He nodded, and said, "And one rather attractive young man."

This account can be found in Robert Kaiser's book, "Clerical Error" (2002). The woman was his wife. (pp.284-285)

Kaiser was the TIME magazine correspondent in Rome in the early 1960's.
Martin was a source who became a close family friend. Martin didn't just break up Kaiser's family. (Kaiser and his wife Mary had two young children.) It was much darker. To allay suspicions, Martin mobilized a network of influential contacts to smear Kaiser and have him committed as a paranoid schizophrenic.
 

ZIONIST AGENT AND LIAR


Martin's books exposed satanic practices in the Catholic church, and the Pope's role in the New World Order. While pretending to be against  world government and the decline of traditional faith and practice, Martin went a long way to discrediting the church. His many books were published by Illuminati mind controller Simon and Schuster, which was a sign that something was fishy.

Kaiser's book, on the other hand, is published by Continuum which bills itself as "unconstrained by the interests of any global media group or academic institution, and based in London and New York."

In it, Kaiser recalls that Martin started hanging out with two officials of the New York-based American Jewish Committee and flashing $100 bills. The Jews were particularly concerned that the 1962  Second Vatican Council pass "the Jewish Schema" which absolved Jews of blame for Christ's Crucifixion and by implication accept guilt for  2000 years of anti-Semitism.

This is a typical example of how Illuminati mind controllers invert good and evil. The Crucifixion of Christ was part of an ancient conspiracy against God and man reaching fruition with the New World Order.

"Martin was their lobbyist." Kaiser wrote. "These Jews were using him and paying him well for his help. (190)

Martin was the secretary to Cardinal Augustin Bea who spearheaded the Schema and a general liberalization of church dogma and practice. According to an article in Wikipedia, Martin passed confidential documents to the American Jewish Committee, which is a front for Illuminati bankers. He also wrote under pseudonyms many inflammatory articles for Illuminati magazines like Harper's describing the foot dragging of Vatican conservatives.

Martin had a reputation as a liar. Mark Owen cites psychiatrist M. Scott Peck's book "Glimpses of the Devil"  about possession and exorcism. According to Peck, Martin, although a formidable scholar and polyglot (17 languages), could by turns be a "pathological liar" and a "leprechaun."

In an email, Owen told me that Peck said that in his book "Hostages to the Devil" Martin claimed he performed exorcisms that were actually performed by Peck.

MATURITY

Bob Kaiser's book, Clerical Error is also about attaining maturity. Kaiser spent 10 years as a Jesuit himself. He makes the point that immaturity is really a function of having "idols and "taking guidance from "authorities" like the Jesuits or "experts."

Kaiser was fooled by Martin's collar and couldn't see what was happening in his own home. Then instead of taking action, he sought help from the Jesuit Order, who generally prevaricated. His so-called friends didn't alert him.

Kaiser learned that maturity is not so much gaining wisdom as confidence in one's own judgment, trusting oneself no matter one's limitations.

"Thou shalt have no other gods before me" is really an order from God to all of us: to take charge of ourselves, think our own thoughts, and feel our own feelings. I other words, to grow up." (262)

For a lot of us, maturity has been realizing that no one knows very much, and there are a lot of unscrupulous, stupid and evil people in the world.

One of these was Malachi Martin. Just a month ago I posted an article about his claims of a "satanic enthronement in the Vatican." I had always regarded him as a good guy although I wondered about his Jewish publisher.

Now, I would avoid his work, because I regard him as a classic example of the Illuminati phoney opposition. Martin pretended to oppose the dismantling of the Catholic Church while secretly advancing it. His personal behavior revealed where his true loyalties lay. 

---
Thanks to Mark Owen for referring me to Clerical Error

Related    Michael Hoffman on Malarchy Martin



 

You can find this article permanently at http://www.henrymakow.com/malachi_martin_1.html
Articles >>

Comments for "Bursting the Malachi Martin Bubble"

Christine said (March 18, 2010):

Thank you for exposing Malachi Martin. It has been most exasperating to see well-meaning Christians fawn over this fiend's writings when his life was a scandal and a disgrace to the Catholic Church and the Jesuit Order (no, the Jesuits haven't always been a bunch of rotters like MM).

As the NY Times said in their obituary of MM. he was survived by his longtime companion, Miss Kakia Livanos. Some people never change!

Mike said (March 18, 2010):

You know Henry, I’m surprised…not shocked, but surprised. When I was in Seminary from 1984-87 the philosophical lines were so clear that by looking at where an author obtained his degrees you got an immediate feel for how he thought and the slant of his writing. No so now days. Back in the day I never would have thought of looking at one’s publisher as a conflict of interest when discussing operational philosophies.

V said (March 18, 2010):

nteresting article 'Bursting the Malachi Martin Bubble'. Last year I bought a copy of the book 'Codeword Barbelon' and the author P.D. Stuart sites Malachi Martin extensively in the book especially towards the end. I read one of the Amazon reviewers on the book after I read it and the reviewer didn't find the book credible because of the "history" of Malachi. From what Mark Owen told me about Malachi and what I gathered on him I didn't find Malachi believable. On Wikipedia it was written that many of Malachi's books were fiction and many were non-fiction. I would put them all in the fiction bin.

What a fitting article on St. Patrick's Day Henry on an Irishman that might have been a double agent between the Vatican and certain Jewish interests. Malachi Martin's credibility is zero in my book.

Funny how Malachi was never released his vow of chastity. That didn't stop him none.

Tony said (March 17, 2010):

Glad you got the real scoop on Martin.
Protestants in general hang on his every word.

They are forever (very unchristian like) protesting The Church so they revel in every tidbit Martin exposed or dreamed up while downplaying their own dirty linen which could reach to infinity. This is all part of living in the Protestant strongholds on earth. Real investigation shows over and over again that Catholicism is much less the hypocrite.

Below, "Bury Me at Starbucks" (scroll down)

Bigger Text | Default Text | Smaller Text |

Opus Dei -- Catholic Church Embraces Satanic Cult

March 16, 2010



opus_dei01.jpgThere is confusion about Opus Dei since traditionally, the Catholic Church always condemned Secret Societies.

by Marie Henrie
(for henrymakow.com) 
 

  The last century saw many changes in the Catholic Church. One such change was the granting of Personal Prelature status on Opus Dei, which is a sect within the Catholic Institutional structure, created by Josemaria Escriva de Balaguer in 1928.

"In 1982, Opus Dei was established as a 'Personal Prelature' by Pope John Paul II. The term 'Personal' means that membership of Opus Dei is not linked to territory (as is the case in a diocese, for instance.) 'Prelature' means that the head of Opus Dei is a 'Prelate' appointed by the Pope.

The Vatican Yearbook indicates that Opus Dei includes about 1,800 priests. The remainder of the 85,000 members are laypersons. Approximately a quarter of Opus Dei's members are "numeraries," who have committed themselves to celibacy in order to be more available for the organization's activities.

The majority of the lay members are "supernumeraries," who are involved in Opus Dei's activities but do not make a commitment of celibacy. Opus Dei additionally has many "cooperators," who assist its activities through prayer, donations, or other means"

. http://sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Opus_Dei

The election of Pope John Paul II resulted in the installation of many Opus affiliates within the hierarchical structure of the Vatican. The canonization of Escriva solidified the sect's legitimacy. There is confusion about Opus Dei since traditionally, the Catholic Church always condemned Secret Societies. 


NEW WORLD ORDERLIES


A website question asked what the Church's official position is on Opus Dei as late as 2007. The answer given by a Fr. Michael reflects the opinion of many Catholics:

" Jose Maria Escriva de Balaguer, the founder of Opus Dei, anticipated and developed 30 years before Vatican II a revolutionary, new, secular theology of the laity, and accepted the principle of pluralism and indifferentism:  a NovusOrdo Seclorum. In 1982 John Paul II created this group as a "personal prelature." 

Suspiciously, this act occurred in the same year that the wealthy sect allegedly transferred almost $1,000,000,000 into the Vatican Bank, bailing it out of an embarrassing bankruptcy.  In a second maneuver that raised eyebrows, the pope placed the founder of Opus Dei on the "fast track" for New Order sainthood, accelerating an often centuries-long waiting-period for canonization to a mere twenty years.

       Opus Deistas are part of the New Order Church.  Opus Dei is a chameleon organization, being liberal or conservative, whichever benefits its agenda. 

Juan Estruch in his book, Saints and Schemers described this as "dual ethics." 


MURDER AND INTRIGUE

Michael Walsh, in his book, "Opus Dei: An Investigation into the Secret Society Struggling For Power Within the Roman Catholic Church," has also written in detail about the inner workings of Opus Dei."

Opus Dei vehemently denies bailing out the Vatican Bank due to the scandal however, murder and intrigue continue to surround Opus Dei and its members. In 2006 we read...

"The men -- financial consultant Filippo Botteri, computer expert EmilioToscani and workman Marco Baldi -- were charged with kidnapping banker Gianmario Roveraro, 70, as he was going home from an Opus Dei meeting July 5, and later killing and dismembering him.".

http://www.mail-archive.com/ctrl@listserv.aol.com/msg120134.html 

An Opus Dei member, "former FBI Agent Robert Hanssen, was the worst of any American spy.

http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0105/18/ltm.10.html

What is so curious is Hanssen's marked religious piety and devotion to his wife and family and conversely, his obsession with pornography and traitorous acts on behalf of Soviet Russia.. Hanssen's one-word explanation for his treason, according to an FBI affidavit, was "loyalty." It may well be that his loyalty -- to Opus Dei and, by extension, the Foreign Service of the Vatican State -- hold the key to the mystery.

Hanssen "was a regular parishioner of St. Catherine of Sienna Church, in a Virginia suburb of the capital, where an elite congregation, which includes Supreme Court justice Anton Scalia, attend traditional Latin masses."

http://www.pacificnews.org/jinn/stories/6.31/010305-spy.html


PAUL WEYRICH

Besides Robert Hanssen, another prominent Opus Dei member was the late Paul Weyrich, a Reagan Insider who accompanied Reagan for the 1987 Moscow Economic summit prior to the alleged "fall' of Communism and the USSR. He was a friend of the communist leader Mikhail Gorbachev.

 "In the early days, he (Paul Weyrich) was a pioneer of the new right," recalled Brent Bozell. longtime friend of Weyrich.Weyrich is credited with coining the term "Moral Majority" and for encouraging conservative pastors, many of whom had avoided partisan politics, to become more active in the public arena."

http://news.yahoo.com/s/politico/20081218/pl_politico/16722

Weyrich founded the Washington D.C. -based think tank, Heritage Foundation, and the Committee for the Survival of Free Congress" on behalf of the Rockefellers.

http://newsletters.cephasministry.com/ncp8.html 

 

POLAND AND SOLIDARITY


Lech Walesa, the Solidarity union leader who had cooperated with John Paul II to weaken the Communist regime in Poland attended the canonization of Escrivá in 2002.

Walesa said, "At last we have a saint for the workers."

This homage reflected Walesa's debt to Opus Dei. From 1980 onward, the Vatican, Opus Dei, and the CIA passed funds, intelligence, and supplies across the Iron Curtain to Solidarity, the anti-communist union that Walesa headed.

In 2005, Walesa told the Polish parliament that Solidarity had paved the way for globalization: "Irrespective of today's judgment and the price we had to pay in this generation, we were able to close an epoch of divisions, different blocs and borders, opening the way for an era of globalization."

In reply, "Poland's President Aleksander Kwasniewski, a former communist, said Walesa and other Solidarity leaders deserved the gratitude of all Poles for ushering in the democracy that led to Poland becoming a NATO and European Union member."

http://www.scp-inc.org/publications/journals/J2902/index.php 

 In payment for their role in the demise of the USSR, Opus Dei has been allowed to establish a presence in Russia. This is something the Eastern Catholic Rites have found nearly impossible due to objections from the Russian Orthodox Church. But not so for Opus Dei.

Along with the political revelations of the events that allegedly "brought down" the USSR, recent reports suggest  Pope John Paul II himself was an Opus Dei member.


OPUS DEI ACTS LIKE A SATANIC CULT

The sect has been widely criticized for being a cult. According to the BBC,

"Opus Dei has come under fire for the dubious nature of their recruiting techniques - indeed, most denominations welcome new members, but it has been claimed that you have to be invited to Opus Dei, and that it is difficult for members to leave"

Former members have been coming forward as well as those adversely impacted by Opus Dei."

 "...former member, Monsignor Vladimir Felzmann, believes that Opus Dei has a covert agenda to its activities. He was a member for 22 years, joining in 1969, and was one of those closest to its founder. The group's overall aim is to recruit, he said. "Covertly it's to have something to which you attract leading scientists and persuade them to join. But it's hard to know who belongs and who doesn't because they're encouraged not to tell you. You don't know what they're up to."

"When you meet people who, as a result of Opus Dei, give up religion and don't want funeral prayers to be said, then that matters."

He said he was saddened, rather than bitter, about the group. "When Christianity and fascism embrace you get Opus Dei. It was born in a time of fascism. They don't teach respect and love for others."

In a book about Véronique Duborgel, a 44-year old kindergarten teacher and former Opus Dei supernumerary, Susan Bell of the Telegraph (Britain), "describes techniques of psychological isolation similar to those sometimes used by sects, and claims that Opus Dei intrudes into the most intimate areas of members' private lives, encourages them to inform on each other and drains their financial resources...she was instructed not to tell family or friends that she was a member of Opus Dei."

A web site has been started in Brazil by former members who wish to expose the true character of Opus Dei.


http://www.odan.org/what_is_opus_dei.htm


 



You can find this article permanently at http://www.henrymakow.com/opus_dei.html
Articles >>

Comments for "Opus Dei -- Catholic Church Embraces Satanic Cult"

Larry said (March 18, 2010):

I was in opus dei for a while. I am a Catholic in Chicago. There as not evidence to me of such malevolent subtext, except I did see a more than a few people who said they were "former" Jews and were very supportive of Israel.

That seemed odd to me.

You want to get these people mad, ask why the Church did not support "the end does not justify the means" when it comes to the atomic bomb used against Japan to "shorten" the war.

http://www.fpp.co.uk/bookchapters/articles/Hiroshima.html

http://catholic-caveman.blogspot.com/2009/08/atomic-bombing-of-japan-can-catholics.html

Ted said (March 17, 2010):

I can't speak for the larger organization, but only from my contact with it's members. If this means anything, and I think it does, it indicates a far different organization than what is painted in this article.

I am not, nor are my family, members of Opus Dei. However, I have found Opus Dei members to be some of the finest examples of core Christian values I've ever met. Their high moral and spiritual standards set them apart from the Catholic church as a whole. They practice what they preach, which I find is a rare commodity in the world of organized Christianity.

My boys have all participated in youth programs set up and run by Opus Dei members. These programs emphasized high morals, spiritual reflection and personal integrity, as well as being a lot of fun. They also emphasized personal responsibility and high achievement. The boys loved it, and always looked forward to the program.

They were never indoctrinated, recruited or molested.

I am not easily impressed, and have a natural suspicion about any organization. Nevertheless, we found Opus Dei to be rare gem.

--

Thanks for this testimony, Ted

These secret societies seem to operate behind a protective covering of unimpeachable souls.

H

SG said (March 17, 2010):

Barbara Olsen and her husband, Ted Olsen, were members of Opus Dei. Barbara is alleged to have
been on the fateful flight from Dulles to LAX on 9/11. Her husband announced that she tried to
phone him while onboard the ill-fated flight. The FBI, however, failed to support his claims even as he served at that time as the Solicitor General at the US Dept of Justice.

Bob said (March 17, 2010):

(I don't want this to sound like a "I'm Catholic and that hurt my feelings" whiney comment.)

Instead, I'll say that the press re Opus Dei
I've seen, from what I can tell, is coming
from a generalist establishment-based rivaling spirit.

Particularly liberal self-interest discourse
is bothered by the structure of Opus Dei
because it's outside the official Church
hierarchy, where feminists, gays and black
communists have made lots of inroads.
In addition, it has a strong practice of
sex-specific congregating, which is very
much out of fashion in East Coast trends to
organizing people spiritually -- I'm sure this
fuels the criticism of OD.

Of what I know of Opus Dei, it has a strong
bent toward simplicity of theology, and stresses
the mindfulness of God in daily life, particularly
in work. Also, many of the priests in OD are
of a very strong, non-cosmopolitan, non-run-with-
the-crowd character -- but it's just my personal impression.

ALSO, and I should have said this sooner --
I don't think we've heard all there is about the
Hanssen case. I got a vibe, based on one of the
write-ups the Wash. Post did on him, that he
was some kind of patsy -- possibly to scare
principled Catholics inside law enforcement and
intelligence orgs out of blowing the whistle.

I think articles like this one would be wise to
be a little more careful....Again, I hope this doesn't come across as defensive, but I don't think the full politics of OD can be easily summarized, nor who has a stake in opposing them.
------

I wish I could relay my ideas to you re Catholicism
w/out having to type them out.

Since it's the end of the day, I'll give you a
brief point that popped into my head on reading
your reply. Specifically, Catholicism in a way
I think is unique for forming people to think
for themselves. I know, it sounds like a strong
statement, particularly since most non-Catholics
would be inclined to say the opposite. BUT,
the core belief in Catholics is their purpose
is to know and live the truth -- which is why
it took me so long to get used to way of
looking at things of people from other faiths.

Unlike adherents of other faiths, based on
the influence of their formation, Catholics
do not "take sides" as the core mode of how
they behave with respect to ethical decisions.
Because of this, Catholicism is to a degree
more purified with respect to the goings-on
of secret societies and other group-based
modes of "getting in cahoots" w/one's people, etc.

Irish Dan said (March 17, 2010):

For ordinary members of the Roman Catholic Church, these ' Churches Within Churches ' are a matter of grave concern and they present a monumental problem for Parish Priests and Bishops! Basically when clergy and religious of these orders become involved in parish life, it is like the F.B.I. working in a local police area, they in essence can do what they like locally while any problems arising cannot be dealt with by local authority, they can only complain to Hq, where these people are well entrenched to with other centralized power brokers to protect their mutual interests.

As I write our Irish Cardinal is fielding sustained calls for his resignation, as a priest he was involved in the case of another priest who was a practicing pedophile! The Cardinal back then did things by the book, he uncovered evidence of the offending priests crimes, he ensured that he was removed from parish duties and as he was an Order priest, he was handed over to his order to contain and police, who were far more tolerant of his activities. The Law finally caught up and he died in jail.

By Cannon Law all the local church could do was pass on the files to the offender's Irish province head and to Rome. Here if this particular Order did not have it's own Cardinal on the committee, then there were plenty other Order Cardinals who operate an interlinking, mutually benefiting club. At that level protecting the reputation and influence of the order is the priority of the day, the ignored victims of their vile foot soldiers are left in their individual hells without the slightest concern for their welfare.

Some fifteen years ago I accompanied the mother of a young boy that was being used as a child prostitute by his father and others in a child sex ring. to a meeting with the late Irish Cardinal O'Daly. He did not stand in ceremony, he readily granted a breakfast meeting, he was visibly moved and upset at what he heard, he expressed his grave concern but because the abuse facilitators were an order of Nuns, he also spelled out to the mother how little influence he had in the situation.

He could not directly interfere, he could only send it up the line to Rome and hope that the Curia officials would call in the Head of the Order..... which was unlikely to happen inside of six months, there was a backlog!. When the mother told the nuns of her visit to the Cardinal they openly laughed at her. Some display of Christianity.

Below -- "Zionist Shill is Rising Star in Holland" (scroll down)

Bigger Text | Default Text | Smaller Text |

Would US Troops Fire on Americans?

March 15, 2010


bonusarmy.jpgThere were more than one hundred dead and wounded, including children and babies,in 1932 when US troops dispersed a camp of WW1 veterans demanding only what had been promised them.


Have No Doubt America...

By M. Ernest Smith

msmith181@columbus.rr.com

(for henrymakow.com)

Your browser may not support display of this image. 

The question often has been asked, especially during these last few years, if American military troops would indeed fire upon American citizens if so ordered by Washington.  The answer?  Have no doubt America, because it's already happened.

WWI was a terrible war that introduced new weapons and tactics resulting 100,000 US deaths as well as US 200,000 wounded and gassed in the first eighteen months alone.

The soldiers fighting that war for America earned between $1.00 and $1.50 per day while those serving under Selective Service in factories supporting the war earned as much as ten times that amount. After the war, the veteran soldiers demanded to be paid what they had lost during the war years as "adjusted compensation" as promised by the United States government. Later, their detractors would call it a "bonus".


FAST FORWARD TO 1928

Herbert Hoover, a self-made millionaire, said during his inaugural address that "the future of the country was bright with hope"...  Seven months later the Great Depression hit.  In 1932, there was 25% unemployment and many of the unemployed were WWI veterans and their families.  It was decided that the veterans lead by Walter W. Waters  would march on Washington, D.C.

By May of 1932, there were approximately 10,000 veterans and a few families totaling 30,000, who occupied what was called the Anacostia Flats neighborhood of Washington, D.C. where the vets slept in tents, barrels and some makeshift huts in almost a foot of mud. 

Later, the veterans and their families proceeded to march and demonstrate to remind the Congressional representatives to keep their promise of compensation to the WWI vet, so badly needed and necessary during this nationwide financial disaster. 

At first, the Congress approved the measure but the Senate soundly defeated it days later.  It was during this time President Hoover resolved to drive the veterans out of Washington D.C. back to their homes. However, the larger problem was that most of the veterans didn't have any homes.  Many were squatting in abandoned buildings.

Solution? President Hoover ordered the Washington, D.C. police to drive the vets out of the abandoned buildings.  As with any forcible action, it was met with resistance...people fought the police...bricks were thrown and the police opened fire: two vets were killed.

It seems that anytime there is a police action around a government capital, troops are called...reader, take notice.


GENERAL MACARTHUR


President Hoover ordered General Douglas MacArthur who led 200 Cavalry, 400 armed troops, tanks and other armored vehicles against AMERICAN citizens and veterans of a war the government sent them to fight and die!

General MacArthur was not the only "Who's Who" participating in this "tyrannyfest", General MacArthur's aide, General Dwight D. Eisenhower and then Major George Patton also had a hand in the action.  It should be noted that a witness, then seven year old Naamen Seigle, witnessed Major Patton draw his saber and lead the charge against the mass of veterans.

With Patton and the Calvary charging, the 400 ground troops dawned their gas masks and proceeded to hurl gas grenades into the crowd of veterans, a bitter reminder of battles such as in the Meuse-Argonne Forest in France. 

No, this gassing was compliments of their own government.  As the veterans ran choking from the effects of the gas, the troops with bayonets fixed, charged and jabbed their way into the crowd.  Hundreds of veterans were injured and several killed.

After General MacArthur gained control of the situation, President Hoover ordered the General to proceed no further. But General MacArthur had other ideas.  General MacArthur is quoted as saying "I cannot bother with pieces of paper during a military operation" and advanced on the Anacostia Flats encampment.  It was during this unauthorized attack that MacArthur ordered the burning of the encampment to the ground.

What justification did General MacArthur use? He felt a Communist plot for revolution was at hand.  Reader, beware. 

What do we learn from this piece of history?  The government will use our own military to suppress its citizenry if it feels threatened and it will use any excuse to do so.

--------------------------

Note: Posse Comitatus does not apply to Washington D.C. because it is a federal district governed by the U.S. Congress (U.S. Constitution, Article 1. Section 8. Clause 17).  As usual, they have their bases covered.

----
Mike Smith is a 49 year old Senior at Liberty University majoring in Psychology and preparing for his Masters work in Professional Counseling. " I find myself apolitical with only the best interest of humanity in mind and a firm believer in God and Truth."

You can find this article permanently at http://www.henrymakow.com/would_american_troops_fire_on.html
Articles >>

Comments for "Would US Troops Fire on Americans?"

Angelo said (March 16, 2010):

And it’s no different anywhere in the world.

There is a solution...probably over simplifies.

I request all people of the world...DO NOT JOIN THE POLICE FORCE OR THE MILITARY.

By doing so you remove the power from the vultures. Because without them both they have NO POWER!

PLEASE...PLEASE people of the World, wake up. As long as we volunteer to work for them they can and will use

Us against ourselves. As long as we give our Fathers, Mothers, Daughters, Sons...

So whose fault is it?

Remember this, no citizen of the world has ever caused a WAR...EVER! It’s the Elite/Government/Illuminati that cause WAR.

Good Luck World, we need it.

Hilf said (March 16, 2010):

In response to the above article and the link to the Stanford Prison Experiment, one saying springs to mind. "" Fear God, but fear more the one who is not afraid of Him". Without fear of the Almighty, man is capable of the most demonic acts.

Tony said (March 16, 2010):

he operative word in this question, Henry, is "myrmidon." People should look it up in older dictionaries. Myrmidons will execute any order from whomever pays them without question or mercy. They don't pity anyone or any circumstance some else may be in. We run into them every day when dealing even with the most low level bureaucrats. The military is full of them. Why do you think local cop shops like to hire ex MPs and other military cops? They're trained from day one of enlistment to be myrmidons. Hell, they're trained from day one of their lives. Neighborhood watch and other spy on your neighbors organizations are made to order for such training.

Derel said (March 16, 2010):

Hi. In reference to the article "Would US Troops Fire on Americans?" I would respond with an emphatic YES!!! Regardless of the romantic version of what most average Americans believe about their beloved defenders of their liberties, the truth is quite different. If you and your reader's have noticed the escalating number of news stories that involve police initiated violence against citizens for some of the most frivolous of reasons, then you know it's not at all hard to believe that both the military and the police will prey on civilians whether or not they are order to or not. Both the military and the police serve the same master. They are the enforcement arm of the state. They enforce the will of the state(laws). I've become accustomed to the aforementioned news stories but I can hardly believe many of the comments that follow. People electro-shocked by taser, beaten, and even killed by the "good guys" and people think they deserved it. Forget about blaming the actual aggressor or the one who introduces violence in, what is frequently a verbal conversation. I could go on but I won't. The answer to the question above is yes for me. How can it be otherwise? The military is trained to follow orders and leave the moral justification to its masters. Just like their domestic counterparts the cops, they're not held accountable for the bulk of their violent actions. After all, they're just doing their jobs, right? They're all heroes right? Yeah right. If any other individual did what they did and didn't wear uniform we would be considered criminals. Enough said.

Geoff said (March 16, 2010):

Well I guess people forget the Whisky Rebellion when that POS George Washington sent 10,000 U.S. Army troops into the Alleghenies to shut down the stills that were out competing his slave run distillery. Do'nt forget the draft riots in New York put down by the mass murdering degenerate Abraham Lincoln along with 200,000 southern Americans. Don't forget the Haymarket Riot. Remember the Washita,Sand Creek and Wounded Knee Massacres perpetrated on the First Americans. Since Kent State was brought up,anybody remember the Jackson State Massacre and all the black kids gunned down during the same period as Kent State. How about the Ludlow Massacre of the miners as well as their women and children in Colorado! Hell yes the U.S. military will pull the trigger on Americans. Land of the free and home of the brave my big white@$$! They will do it without a thought or a tinge of conscience,if they have one,which is doubtful! Freedom ain't free and the American people have been remiss in paying the bill,which is why we are in the mess we are in!

JD said (March 16, 2010):

Of course the military will fire on Americans. However, this is 2010 and there is a new spirit among the people including the military. Few citizens, military included, trust the government. And since Waco and Ruby Ridge, Americans are bit put out with government muscle.

Will there be fighting in the streets? I don't think so, that's to say not immediately. There will be some scuffles and some will die and be maimed on "Main Street America," but the real fighting will unfold in a much more sinister manner. Both sides will pick high value targets and eliminate them as though they were farmers eliminating pesty varmints. Then the government provocateurs will play their hand and this is where the government will make their fatal mistake. All hell will break loose.

It's at this point the rumors of hundreds American of detention camps will be proven true or false. I assume the former and pray the latter is true. The government is drunk with power at the moment and if John, Traitor, McCain gets his bill through people will mysteriously disappear without charges or trial. This out of control power will rear its ugly head for violence is all tyrants understand and they will forego their better judgment to crush any and all threats. It what tyrants do.

Lock and load and wait for the right time. Its coming as sure as the sun rises in the east. Expect the worst. This witch's brew has been conjured up and fermenting for many decades. Americans are going to discover, first hand, the nature of a tyrant like Lenin, Stalin or Mao. Millions will die, but fear not for it is better to die for the truth than to live a lie.

Be of good cheer and of a Brave Heart! (WW) Good day.

The Author Mike Smith said (March 16, 2010):

The Kent State incident was not intentional and was the result of nervous Ohio Army National Guard troops, not federal troops led by a career General who sent his secretary to fetch his uniform for the specific occasion. Again, the Waco incident, not the same: these were armed citizens (I’m not saying what the government did was right, I’m just citing the circumstance) with an array of concerns---they were murdered while defending themselves. What makes the “Bonus March” unique is:

1. This was a peaceful demonstration.

2. This was a mass of people exercising Constitutional rights.

3. This was a group of people calling attention to the government to fulfill promises it had made.

4. This group was unarmed and consisted of troops that had served the government faithfully and some of their families.

5. This group was mostly homeless, jobless and in some cases, starving before they arrived and received assistance.

6. This group was embarrassing the government.

7. The Hoover administration made a conscience decision to send the troops in with the intention of doing harm.

While the Waco incident had its merits, the government could hide behind a lie of enforcing the law. In the case of the Bonus March, the government made an outright decision to attack its own citizenship.

Bob said (March 16, 2010):

have no doubt they would kill fellow citizens after being desensitized to killing and cruelty. At the time of writing I am watching a documentary on the US Seventh Cavalry during the Korean war. They interview a couple of the veterans who admit that they killed dozens of Korean refugees after being ordered to do so by their commanders. The Commanders told them that there may be North Koreans soldiers amongst the refugees so it's O.K to kill the refugee?
These poor men were deeply troubled by what they did, some said they have never had a good nights sleep since killing these refugees, goes to show mankind is a spiritual being.

Bury Me at Starbucks

Bigger Text | Default Text | Smaller Text |

March 17, 2010


26starbucks.jpgBURY ME AT STARBUCKS (HUMOR)

by Henry Makow Ph.D.

I turned 60 last November. When you reach this ripe old age, you start to ponder your final resting place.

Recently, my wife and I were musing on this subject. An emigrant might want to be buried in his homeland. A sailor might wish his ashes strewn across the sea.

What were my favorite places?  When I want to relax and read a paper and see people, I generally go to Starbucks.

I can't think of a better place to spend eternity than surrounded by beautiful people, tasteful Jazz and fragrant coffee aromas. True, I wouldn't be able to read the paper...

The customers at Starbucks are generally unaware of mankind's desperate condition, and still full of youthful optimism. They are trying to better themselves.

I like the company of hopeful, capable people. They tend to care about their appearance. Starbucks is the American equivalent of an English pub. It's a meeting place.

But, you say, a meeting place is not a cemetery.

My Starbucks has a fireplace. People could be cremated and discreetly secreted in the stone foundation.

Starbucks executives should consider this as part of a customer loyalty program. Buy 500 Lattes and go to Starbucks heaven.

----

[DISCLAIMER. THIS IS NOT INTENDED AS AN ENDORSEMENT OF STARBUCKS. (I make better coffee at home.) Some people need to lighten up!]
--------

REPLY FROM DAN: BURY ME AT TIM HORTON'S

And even here the classes of men reveal themselves. On holiday in Niagara Falls my partner and I went to Starbucks for cappuccino and pastries. First off they use a lot of stainless steel, large tinted windows and those damn high wooden stools that always set off my sciatic. So it felt like a bad day at work with good coffee and confections. The atmosphere feels a bit like work too. Yes those well dressed young people sans wrinkles in their shirts, even while on vacation and ever so confident in their menu choices-with eyes flicking back and forth in an all too familiar pattern that communicated calculations afoot deep within their minds, "yes I am aware that froth is fifty cents extra, I come here all the time." When you near the half century mark you don't begrudge youthful optimism as much as you are confident through life experiences that half a dozen call center jobs will eventually beat that out of them.

When the bill was presented for twenty dollars (about twenty-two U.S. at the time as the Loonie was hedging the Greenback on this particular outing), I realized that no, Starbucks isn't for my class. So asking directions and heading a little farther into the Great White North and tucked right next to Food Basics was Tim Hortons. Now this is a coffee shop that I could afford to be buried in. Not only did they make my coffee exactly as I like it with double sugar and cream but we got twice the pastries for around six dollars, (about seven-fifty U.S.). And you aren't troubled by that optimism here. Yes, the men in muddy jeans and pensioners aren't trying to climb the corporate ladder, they know where they are in life and they have arrived.

I guess that if I died on vacation, that peculiar condition that says, ah what the hell, it's okay to take a quarter of what I've been saving as a down payment for a house and book this trip and I had my druthers, I'd prefer my plot to be at Hortons rather than Bucks. And at least I'd be a little closer to Canada, a land of people and government that I admire and respect.






20 Actors Wanted by Canadian Military

Bigger Text | Default Text | Smaller Text |

March 12, 2010

061028Edmonton02.jpgCanadian Military Hiring 20 Actors

Dear Henry:
 
     I thought this might interest you.  I live in Barrie, Ontario.  There are absolutely no jobs here, I mean you can't even get a job at a fast food joint! (no coverage of this however).  Thus, I am constantly on the job bank looking for work.  Last night, after reading an article on Truthseeker about US Military training [to combat civilians], I went on the job bank and found this job posting.  I bet the sheeple are lining up for this one, totally oblivious to the true nature.  See attached for actual job posting.


Job Number: 4896012

Title: Actor/actress (CFB Borden-civilian positions) (NOC: 5135)

Terms of Employment: Temporary, Full Time, On Call, Day, Night, Evening

Salary: $14.00 Hourly for 40 hours per week

Anticipated Start Date: 2010/05/01

Location: CFB Borden, Ontario (20 vacancies )

Skill Requirements:

Education: Completion of high school 

Credentials (certificates, licences, memberships, courses, etc.): Not required 

Experience: No experience 

Languages: Speak English 

Work Conditions and Physical Capabilities: Fast-paced environment, Work under pressure, Physically demanding, Attention to detail 

Work Site Environment: Noisy, Outdoors 

Work Location Information: Rural area 

Essential Skills: Oral communication, Working with others, Continuous learning 

Other Information:*Role Players (actors) will be involved in basic military training exercises and will be expected to perform in a broad spectrum of roles: POW's, suspicous [sic]  persons, etc *Must get First Aid and WHMIS


 

Iraq Joke--Lots to Agree About

Bigger Text | Default Text | Smaller Text |

March 9, 2010



A Marine squad was marching north of Fallujah when they came upon an Iraqi terrorist who was badly injured and unconscious.  On the opposite side of the road was an American Marine in a similar but less serious state.  The Marine was conscious and alert and as first aid was given to both men, the squad leader asked the injured Marine what had happened.

 

The Marine reported, "I was heavily armed and moving north along the highway here, and coming south was a heavily armed insurgent. We saw each other and both took cover in the ditches along the road.

 

I yelled to him that "Saddam Hussein was a miserable, lowlife scum bag who got what he deserved".

 

And he yelled back that "Barack Obama is a
lying, good-for-nothing, left wing Commie who isn't even an American".

 

So I said that "Osama Bin Laden dresses and acts like a frigid, mean-spirited lesbian"! 

 

He retaliated by yelling, "Oh yeah? Well, so
does Nancy Pelosi!"

 

"And, there we were, in the middle of the road, shaking hands, when a truck hit us."