Douglas Reed- Anti Gentilism Came before Anti Semitism
September 1, 2014
Douglas Launcelot Reed (1895-1976) raised the alarm
about the Illuminati Jewish conspiracy in key books like
The Controversy of Zion (1978).
A former London Times correspondent and author of 24 books,
his fearless revelations effectively ended his career.
In this provocative excerpt from "Disgrace Abounding"(1939),
he says Nazi race policies are a mirror image of Jewish ones
and he wrestles with a solution to the "Jewish Question."
by Douglas Reed
(Excerpt by henrymakow.com)
anti-Semitism but anti-Gentilism came first. You have heard a lot in
recent years about Hitler's Nuremberg anti-Jewish laws, with their
ban on intermarriage, which the Germans call race-defilement.
A most intelligent and cultured and open-minded Jew in Budapest said to me, 'After all, the Nuremberg laws are only the translation into German of our own Mosaic laws, with their ban on intermarriage with Gentiles'.
Race-antagonism began, not with the Gentiles, but with the Jews. Their religion is based on it. This racial lunacy which you detest in the Germans has possessed the Jews for thousands of years. When they become powerful, they practise it; as they consolidate their position in one trade after another, in one profession or another, the squeeze-out of Gentiles begins. That was why you found, in Berlin and Vienna and Budapest and Prague and Bucharest, newspapers with hardly a Gentile on the editorial staff, theatres owned and managed by Jews presenting Jewish actors and actresses in Jewish plays praised by the Jewish critics of Jewish newspapers, whole streets with hardly a non-Jewish shop in them, whole branches of retail trade monopolized by Jews.
Jews, if you know them well enough and understand these things enough for them to talk openly with you, will admit this. They cannot deny it.
In the beginning was anti-Gentilism. This, not the perfidy of the Gentiles, prevents the assimilation of the Jews. This prevents them from ever becoming Germans or Poles or Italians. This keeps them welded together as alien communities in foreign lands, communities ultimately hostile to the Gentile.
is their religion? Good, but it is the reason why they cannot be
the defeated countries, the Jews did not use the great power they
achieved to promote and accelerate assimilation. They used it to
increase the power and wealth of the Jews, and their intensive mutual
collaboration, in that era to oust non-Jews from professions, trades
and callings, was the outward and visible sign that anti-Gentilism
remained within them.
The race barriers that had existed against the Jews were broken down, every path was open; but the race-barrier within themselves still existed, and thus you had the misuse of this freedom and those grave signs of its abuse, the exploitation of cheap labour and of young non-Jewish womanhood, which were so repugnant a feature of life in Berlin and Vienna, and still are seen to-day, as I write, in Budapest and Prague.
These are grave things, which need to be understood.
The inner knowledge of this seemingly unbridgeable gulf causes many Jews to take on protective coloring, to change their names, to outdo their Gentile neighbours in vocal patriotism, to obscure the fact that they are Jews. Some, a few, marry Gentiles; to the main body of Jews they are renegades who have 'married outside the faith'. Some, a few, have themselves baptized; but they remain Jews.....
No Jew ever mistakes the man he is dealing with. He knows at once whether the other man is a Jew or a Gentile; it is the first question he asks himself.
How many Gentiles know when they have to do with a Jew? How often have you heard, 'Is he really a Jew? The thought never occurred to me. He doesn't look like one'.
The feeling towards Gentiles that is given the Jew when he comes into the world and is fostered in him within his family circle, is that the Gentiles are people, more stupid than the Jews, who can be used to bring profit and advantage to the Jews.
is a fundamentally hostile attitude, the strength of which is that
the Gentiles, by and large, do not realize its existence. All the
means of protective colouring are used to further it. Outside that
family circle, the Jew is a matey, hail-fellow-well-met brother
citizen. That is not in his heart, nor in his eyes, if you look into
You are a man against whom he has to pit his wits, to outdo his
potential enemy. The basis of it lies in his religion. It is all very
good if both sides realize what is afoot. But it makes assimilation
ASSIMILATION VERSUS EMIGRATION
There are two bitterly antagonistic schools of Jewish thought. One is for assimilation, for ignoring that unbridgeable gulf fixed by the Jewish faith, for settling in the midst of the Christian communities and the various nations, and taking on their forms of life and characteristics.
If you have a young and sturdy race and set a low limit on the number of the Jews, this works fairly well - as for instance, in Serbia. The Serbs were too virile for the Jews to reach disproportionate influence among them - and there were not many Jews. But when a new influx of Jews begins, under the influence of wars or an anti-Semitic movement elsewhere, the trouble starts.
The other Jewish school of thought is for boldly accepting the truth, that Jews are Jews and unassimilable, for setting up a National Jewish state somewhere of which all Jews should be subjects. It is, in my view, the solution and ought at all cost to be done.
Then the native citizen of other countries would know with whom he had to deal and what motives he might expect in that citizen of a foreign state. It would put an end to the Jew who constantly steps across the frontiers and repeatedly changes his language, his nationality, and his professed allegiance, who is a German to-day, an Austrian to-morrow, a Hungarian the day after, and next week an Englishman, who claims a privileged place in the world that is open to no other race or faith, who, in the name of love for that particular country in which he happens at the moment to be, works bee-like for war against the anti-Semitic state that he has left.
you have the ruling idea of the dummer Christ again, the stupid
Gentile who can be egged on to fight the other Gentiles in order to
exterminate anti-Semitism. Organized international Jewry ought, in
the name of dignity alone, to put a stop to this. Protest and fight
against anti-Semitism as much as you like, but do not expect the
nations to go to war about it.
THANKS TO KEVIN BOYLE FOR SENDING THIS. KEVIN'S BLOG
Related- Reed- Hitler - The Jewish Messiah?
Makow comment: This was written almost 80 years ago when Organized Jewry was mounting World War Two. In the interim, the western Gentile nations have become Jews themselves, blindly led by Zionist political, corporate and media shills (i.e. Freemasons), unable to distinguish their own interests, coldly castigating "anti Semites," corrupted by Cabalism, inundated and fractured by "minorities," barely holding to their own identities. Judaism is a satanic cult which first corrupts and enslaves Jews, and through them Gentiles. Most Jews are unaware of this process, the root cause of anti Semitism. Reed's Israel solution is ironic, given the price Palestinians have paid, and the fact Israel is part of a greater "New World Order."
We have to wonder how common this anti Gentilism is today when 70% of non-orthodox US Jews marry non-Jews. Also, to keep this in perspective,
German Jews look down on Polish/Russian Jews and both look down on Jews from Arab countries.
First Comment from Victoria :
Other than the all-pervading 'anti-gentilism of the present day, the only times I experienced that was in Grade 11, in high school, when 2/3 of my class was Jewish. We were pretty much excluded and talked 'down' to as if we were peripheral to requirements. And, about the same time, I worked briefly as a 'mother's helper' for a woman whose husband owned a shoe company up in North York. She, too, left me in no doubt that I was 'the help'.
You can find this article permanently at http://henrymakow.com/2014/09/Anti-Gentilism-Came-before-Anti-Semitism.html
Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at